hokmah
Registry code: 083d523c27104505
Hokmah analyzes the impact of a code change on a PUBLIC GitHub repository, using a graph built from the repository's file tree and recent commit history (no language model is involved). Import a repository once with hokmah_connect_project, then call hokmah_analyze with a plain-language description of the change you plan to make; it returns a risk assessment, the files, symbols and modules likely to be affected, and related history. Use the affected files to decide what to read and test before editing. hokmah_zone_health, hokmah_compare, hokmah_similar_fixes, hokmah_risky_code and…
- endpoint
- https://hokmah.dev/mcp
- protocol
- http-sse ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is hokmah live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 7m ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is hokmah free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does hokmah have?
- 8 tools: hokmah_seams, hokmah_overview, hokmah_risky_code, hokmah_connect_project, hokmah_zone_health, hokmah_compare, hokmah_similar_fixes, hokmah_analyze.
- Is hokmah safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 99.6%· all time 99.6%
last good check
of 8 tools
- degraded → live
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- unknown → live
- used for
- estimate impact of a planned code change
- import a public github repo for analysis
- takes → gives
- text, code → data
- tools
- 1 reads1 changes data
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Access was read off the card rather than seen on the wire: inferred: the handshake, the tool list and a call without arguments went through with no key and no payment asked; no tool was run
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
hokmah_seams unknown 7m ago
Architecture seams of an imported repository: a DISTINCT axis from risk — not "where is the code fragile?" but "where does the code fight its own structure?". A seam is a source of truth split across module boundaries: files in different packages that keep being edited together over the history (e.g. the same list enumerated in two packages). Read from the co-change history alone, scored by near-inseparability (jaccard) with a hub penalty, so wanted shared contracts (api-types/dto/schema...) are listed apart, never counted as debt. Each seam carries its evidence (shared identifiers, co-commits, span) and a confidence; the tool proposes, it does not decide — a seam is not a bug and never appears in the risk axis. `scope` = actionable (default) | all | expected; `min_jaccard` filters weaker seams; `zone` (path prefix or words) narrows to seams touching that zone. Backed by a retrospective bench (backtest_coupling): on the reference repo a flagged seam predicts future co-change with a lift of several times over a random previously-coupled pair.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url" ], "properties": { "zone": { "type": "string", "default": "" }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 30 }, "scope": { "type": "string", "default": "actionable" }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" }, "min_jaccard": { "type": "number", "default": 0 } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 28 lineshokmah_overview unknown 3h ago
Overview of an imported repository: the most fragile areas (fixes per feature over 12 months), the fastest growing and the new ones, the busiest, the largest files, the most co-changed files, and how many internal imports could be resolved.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url" ], "properties": { "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 12 lineshokmah_risky_code unknown 3h ago
Lists current code of an imported repository that lacks a protection the project's own fixes keep adding, learned from the diffs of its past fixes: unguarded access to structures fixes had to guard, including an entry checked to exist but read at [0] without checking it has an element, or passed to a function that dereferences it (R1); results of functions that fixes had to null-check, called the way the fixes checked them and declared nullable, used unchecked (R7); plain objects used as dictionaries keyed by request input and written through the looked-up value, obj[k].x = v (R2, prototype pollution; a one-level write is only a hardening note); template variables inserted unescaped where another file sanitizes them (R3). Optional `zone` (path prefix or words) and `kind` (R1, R2, R3, R7). kind="UI" lists the interface instead: translation keys missing from the base locale or called without the values their text needs (U1), screens that await a request on opening without handling its failure (U4), and, not validated on history, accessibility notes (U5). Each site says why it was flagged; `measured_on_history` gives, per kind, how often such sites turned out to need a fix when the detectors were run on the code of a year earlier. Candidates are not confirmed bugs.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url" ], "properties": { "kind": { "type": "string", "default": "" }, "zone": { "type": "string", "default": "" }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 20 lineshokmah_connect_project changes data unknown never probed
Imports a public GitHub repository so it can be analyzed: indexes its source files (.py .js .ts .jsx .tsx .vue .mjs .mts .rs .go .java) and its latest commits (up to 500) from the default branch into a dependency and change-history graph. `repo_url` is https://github.com/<owner>/<repository>; `branch` is accepted for compatibility. A repository already imported is not imported again. Returns the project id and the number of commits and files ingested.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url" ], "properties": { "branch": { "type": "string", "default": "main" }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 16 lineshokmah_zone_health unknown 7m ago
Says how well a part of an imported repository is doing and what to do about it. `zone` is a path prefix (packages/cli/src/webhooks) or a few words ("MFA recovery codes"). Returns, from the last 12 months of history and the current code: a verdict (stable, active, growing, maintenance, fragile), fixes per feature and per 1000 lines, the recurring fix themes specific to the zone, giant files and functions, files often changed without tests, coupled areas, parallel implementations, and recommendations with the numbers behind each one. No language model is involved.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url", "zone" ], "properties": { "zone": { "type": "string" }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 16 lineshokmah_compare unknown 3h ago
Ranks 2 to 8 zones of an imported repository from the one that works worst to the one that works best, with the reasons: fixes per feature, fixes per 1000 lines and tests, over the last 12 months. Each zone is a path prefix or a few words.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url", "zones" ], "properties": { "zones": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 19 lineshokmah_similar_fixes unknown 7m ago
Finds past fixes of a kind of bug ("null run data guard", "prototype pollution", "race condition on resume") in an imported repository, and the current files where the same defect may still exist: files of the same kind next to the fixed ones, files that usually change with them but were left out, and files that contain the identifiers the fix changed. Read each candidate with the fix in mind; a candidate is not a confirmed bug.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url", "query" ], "properties": { "query": { "type": "string" }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 16 lineshokmah_analyze reads unknown 22h ago
Estimates the impact of a described code change on an imported public GitHub repository. `repo_url` is https://github.com/<owner>/<repository> and `query` describes the change in plain language; `branch` is accepted for compatibility, the analysis uses the history imported from the default branch. Returns a risk assessment with the files, symbols and modules likely to be affected and related commits, computed from the repository graph without a language model.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "repo_url", "query" ], "properties": { "query": { "type": "string" }, "branch": { "type": "string", "default": "main" }, "repo_url": { "type": "string" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 20 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id083d523c27104505.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/083d523c27104505/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/083d523c27104505?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.