dragonseye
https://dragonseye-lookup.dario-9fa.workers.dev
Registry code: 19d5bb3785293b91
Dragons Eye Lookup: Ransomware leak-site claim lookup by company name or domain. Returns ransomware-group claims (group, dates, country, sector, sources) matching the company or domain. Unverified claims from criminal leak sites; commercially reusable sources only.
from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator
- endpoint
- https://dragonseye-lookup.dario-9fa.workers.dev/mcp
- protocol
- http-sse ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is dragonseye live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 1h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is dragonseye free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does dragonseye have?
- 5 tools: pricing, recent_claims, group_profile, lookup_victim, validate_query.
- Is dragonseye safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 100%· all time 100%
last good check
of 5 tools
- unknown → live
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts, and USDC settlements on base into the address this listing's priced doors name, read off the chain. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers. The address also stands behind 8 other origins: the chain figures are the gateway's, not this listing's alone. How it is counted.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
distinct
last 2026-10-10
counted from three payers (thin, concentrated, shared-payto)
Access was read off the card rather than seen on the wire: inferred: the handshake, the tool list and a call without arguments went through with no key and no payment asked; no tool was run
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
pricing unknown never probed
FREE. Prices, network, payment address, data sources and the required 'unverified claim' label.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "properties": {} }arguments 5 linesrecent_claims unknown never probed
Newest ransomware leak-site claims (up to 10), optionally for one group. Commercially reusable sources only, so country/sector are often null. Every result is an unverified claim from a criminal leak site, not a confirmed breach.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "properties": { "group": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 60, "description": "Ransomware group name, e.g. akira, qilin" }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 10, "minimum": 1, "description": "Max claims to return (1-10, default 10)" } } }arguments 17 linesgroup_profile unknown 1h ago
Profile of a ransomware group: aliases, first observation by RansomLook, and a sample of its newest claims. Every claim is an unverified claim from a criminal leak site, not a confirmed breach.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "group" ], "properties": { "group": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 60, "minLength": 1, "description": "Ransomware group name or alias, e.g. akira" } } }arguments 15 lineslookup_victim unknown 1h ago
Has a ransomware group claimed this company or domain on a leak site? Returns matching claims (group, dates, country, sector, sources). Every result is an unverified claim from a criminal leak site, not a confirmed breach.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "q" ], "properties": { "q": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200, "minLength": 1, "description": "Company name or domain, e.g. 'Acme Corp' or acme.com (3-120 chars)" } } }arguments 15 linesvalidate_query unknown 1h ago
FREE. Check and normalize a company name or domain before paying for lookup_victim.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "q" ], "properties": { "q": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200 } } }arguments 13 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id19d5bb3785293b91.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/19d5bb3785293b91/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/19d5bb3785293b91?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.