_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 2h ago

orphicone-vigo

https://lsoatzzwpltpydwyfqqv.supabase.co

Registry code: 1a23c3c53344eb4b

api record

AI-powered Hong Kong SFC regulatory intelligence. Bilingual EN/ZH compliance queries.

from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator

endpoint
https://lsoatzzwpltpydwyfqqv.supabase.co/functions/v1/vigo-mcp
protocol
streamable-http ·2024-11-05
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is orphicone-vigo live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is orphicone-vigo free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does orphicone-vigo have?
10 tools: latest_updates, get_license_guide, autonomous_task, checklist_lookup, compliance_check, query_regulation, risk_assessment, search_enforcement, ….
Is orphicone-vigo safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
98.6%

90 days 98.8%· all time 98.8%

latency
250ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 10 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 405 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
_ what it is for
topic
security & compliance compliance & regulation
used for
  • query hong kong sfc regulations
  • check compliance for a licensed corporation
  • search sfc enforcement actions
  • get sfc licence guides
takes → gives
text, data → text, data
tools
9 reads1 effect unclear
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 10 tools
9 open 1 never probed 9 of 10 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • get_license_guide reads open 19h ago

    Comprehensive guide for a specific SFC license type: exam papers, capital requirements, fit-and-proper criteria, CPD hours.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "license_type"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "aspect": {
      "enum": [
        "overview",
        "exam",
        "capital",
        "fit_and_proper"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "default": "overview"
    },
    "license_type": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "License type: 'Type 1' through 'Type 13'"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 22 lines
  • autonomous_task open 4h ago

    Execute a complex multi-step regulatory task autonomously. VIGO will plan the execution strategy, gather information from multiple sources (regulations, enforcement, knowledge graph), and synthesize a comprehensive report. Use for due diligence, compliance planning, license acquisition roadmaps, or any task requiring multiple analysis steps.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "task"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "task": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "High-level task description, e.g. 'Perform due diligence on applying for Type 9 license with virtual asset management'"
    },
    "context": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional background context about the company or situation"
    },
    "output_format": {
      "enum": [
        "report",
        "action_plan",
        "risk_matrix",
        "timeline"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "default": "report",
      "description": "Desired output format"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 27 lines
  • checklist_lookup reads open 4h ago

    Search the SFC compliance checklist by topic, licence type, or MIC function (CF1-CF8). Returns compliance items with legal references, SOP guidance, case law, and grey area analysis. Use for questions about regulatory obligations, MIC responsibilities, procedural guidance, or compliance requirements.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "query"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Search query in Chinese or English (e.g., 'FRR月報提交', 'MIC CF7 duties', 'complaint handling')"
    },
    "category": {
      "enum": [
        "capital",
        "reporting",
        "aml",
        "conduct",
        "va",
        "governance",
        "mic",
        "sop",
        "legal",
        "enforcement",
        "grey_area",
        "insurance",
        "record_keeping",
        "client_asset",
        "notification",
        "exam_cpt"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional: filter by compliance category"
    },
    "licence_type": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional: filter by licence type (e.g., 'Type 1', 'Type 9')"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 38 lines
  • compliance_check reads open 4h ago

    Perform a compliance health check for a licensed corporation. Input company profile, get a compliance risk assessment covering FRR capital, RO configuration, MIC roles, annual obligations, and regulatory focus areas.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "license_types"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "aum": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Assets under management, e.g. '500M HKD'"
    },
    "num_ros": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Number of Responsible Officers"
    },
    "has_vatp": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "default": false,
      "description": "Whether the firm deals with virtual assets"
    },
    "num_staff": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Total number of staff"
    },
    "license_types": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "License types held, e.g. ['Type 1', 'Type 9']"
    },
    "business_areas": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Business areas, e.g. ['securities dealing', 'asset management']"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 39 lines
  • query_regulation reads open 19h ago

    Query Hong Kong SFC regulatory knowledge. Covers licensing (Type 1-13), compliance, exams, CPD/CPT, AML/CFT, virtual assets (VATP/ASPIRe), and more. Supports English and Chinese.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "question"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "language": {
      "enum": [
        "en",
        "zh",
        "auto"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "default": "auto",
      "description": "Response language"
    },
    "question": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Your regulatory question in English or Chinese"
    },
    "license_type": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional: SFC license type filter, e.g. 'Type 1', 'Type 9'"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 26 lines
  • risk_assessment reads open 9h ago

    Assess compliance risk of a planned business activity. Returns Red/Yellow/Green risk rating with regulatory basis and recommended actions.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "description"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "urgency": {
      "enum": [
        "immediate",
        "planned",
        "exploratory"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "default": "planned",
      "description": "How urgent is this activity"
    },
    "description": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Description of the planned business activity"
    },
    "license_types": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "description": "Relevant license types"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 29 lines
  • search_enforcement reads open 9h ago

    Search SFC enforcement actions including fines, suspensions, bans, and prosecutions. Search by company, person, or violation type.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "query"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "year": {
      "type": "number",
      "description": "Optional year filter (e.g. 2025)"
    },
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Search term: company name, person, or violation type"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 16 lines
  • sop_guide reads open 9h ago

    Get step-by-step Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) guidance for common compliance processes. Available SOPs: KYC onboarding, FRR monthly return, complaint handling, STR filing. Returns detailed steps with responsible person, legal basis, and estimated time.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "process"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "process": {
      "enum": [
        "kyc_onboarding",
        "frr_monthly",
        "complaint_handling",
        "str_filing"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Which SOP process to retrieve"
    },
    "licence_type": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Optional: licence type for context"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 22 lines
  • compliance_score reads open 19h ago

    Calculate compliance health score for a company. Requires company_id from the Portal system. Returns total items, completed, overdue, and score percentage.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "company_id"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "company_id": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Company UUID from OrphicOne Portal"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 12 lines
  • latest_updates reads unknown never probed

    Get latest SFC regulatory updates: circulars, enforcement news, VATP developments, consultation papers.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "count": {
      "type": "number",
      "default": 5,
      "description": "Number of results, 1-10"
    },
    "category": {
      "enum": [
        "circular",
        "enforcement",
        "vatp",
        "consultation",
        "all"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "default": "all"
    }
  }
}
    arguments 21 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 1a23c3c53344eb4b.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/1a23c3c53344eb4b/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/1a23c3c53344eb4b/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/1a23c3c53344eb4b?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
100%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.

_ also on supabase.co 123 entries

Served from the same domain, which is what was measured. Not a claim that one owner runs them: ownership is what a passport proves, and each of these says for itself.

115 more sit on this domain. All of them.