_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 2h ago

cte-mcp-server

https://mcp.cryptotaxedge.com

Registry code: 30e76ab255b558cb

api record

Classify blockchain transactions into US tax treatments, and verify labels already assigned. Use verify_batch to check up to 100 caller-assigned labels against the deterministic basis (agree, disagree with a dispute, or unverifiable; pass fill=true on a row to classify it when no basis exists), classify_batch for up to 100 transaction hashes at once, classify_transaction for a single transaction (same engine and serve semantics as the REST /v1/classify endpoint), lookup_contract for protocol metadata on a contract address, and map_to_chart_of_accounts for accounting mapping. Results include…

endpoint
https://mcp.cryptotaxedge.com
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is cte-mcp-server live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is cte-mcp-server free to use?
Not anonymously — it asks for a key or a login before it will serve. Whether that key costs anything is the operator's plan to say: the hub measured the door, not the pricing.
What tools does cte-mcp-server have?
5 tools: classify_transaction, classify_batch, lookup_contract, map_to_chart_of_accounts, verify_batch.
Is cte-mcp-server safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
98.8%

90 days 99.2%· all time 99.2%

latency
108ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 5 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 377 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
_ what it is for
used for
  • classify crypto transactions for us tax
  • map transactions to a chart of accounts
  • look up a smart contract
takes → gives
data → data
tools
4 reads
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 5 tools
5 auth-required 5 of 5 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • classify_transaction reads auth-required 21h ago

    Classify a single blockchain transaction using CryptoTaxEdge's multi-source consensus engine, the same engine and serve semantics as the public REST /v1/classify endpoint. Returns the /v1 contract fields: category (the open vocabulary the engine emits, for example swap, transfer, staking, reward, airdrop, income_receipt, fee_payment, borrow, repay, collateral_supply, collateral_withdraw, liquidity_add, liquidity_remove, wrap, unwrap, liquid_staking_mint, bridge_transfer, nft_mint, spam, unclassified; the full set with house treatments is at https://cryptotaxedge.com/standard/#categories and grows additively, so branch exhaustive logic on treatment, never on category), treatment (closed enum: disposal, income, non_taxable, expense, needs_review; needs_review means no treatment is asserted and taxable is null), taxable, confidence, needs_review, ledger_action, protocol, description (plain-English reasoning, also returned as explanation for existing clients) and, on hash lookups, assets (sent, received, gas). Works for EVM chains and Solana. Provide tx_hash (chain optional, auto-detected), or contract_address + function_selector + chain for a rule-library tuple lookup.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [],
      "properties": {
        "chain": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Chain slug (e.g. \"ethereum\", \"polygon\", \"bsc\", \"arbitrum\", \"base\", \"optimism\", \"avalanche\", \"solana\"). Optional for tx_hash lookups; the engine auto-detects the chain. REQUIRED for contract_address lookups."
        },
        "tx_hash": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Transaction hash (0x-prefixed 66-char for EVM, base-58 for Solana). Either tx_hash OR contract_address is required."
        },
        "contract_address": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "(Optional) 0x-prefixed contract address the transaction called. With function_selector + chain, performs a rule-library tuple lookup."
        },
        "function_selector": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "(Optional) 0x-prefixed 4-byte function selector (first 4 bytes of tx input data)."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 22 lines
  • classify_batch reads auth-required 21h ago

    Classify a batch of blockchain transactions (up to 100) using CryptoTaxEdge's classification engine. Built for accounting platforms integrating CryptoTaxEdge as their classification layer. Returns per-transaction: category (the open vocabulary the engine emits, for example swap, transfer, staking, reward, airdrop, income_receipt, fee_payment, borrow, repay, collateral_supply, collateral_withdraw, liquidity_add, liquidity_remove, wrap, unwrap, liquid_staking_mint, bridge_transfer, nft_mint, spam, unclassified; the full set with house treatments is at https://cryptotaxedge.com/standard/#categories and grows additively, so branch exhaustive logic on treatment, never on category), treatment (closed enum: disposal, income, non_taxable, expense, needs_review; needs_review means no treatment is asserted), tax_category (the engine's stored treatment value, kept for existing hosts), taxable, confidence score, needs_review, ledger_action, protocol, description (plain-English reasoning, also returned as explanation for existing clients), assets (sent, received, gas) and a reliability envelope with an explicit route-to-review flag. Complex multi-step transactions (flash loans, batch NFT sales, bridges, DCA programs) additionally return a per-leg breakdown and a preparer-ready memo with IRS citations. EVM + Solana. Pass engagement_id / firm_id to apply firm-specific classification policy when configured.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "transactions"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "firm_id": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "(Optional) host-side firm identifier. When firm classification policy is configured, applies that firm's confidence thresholds + CoA overrides."
        },
        "transactions": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "required": [
              "tx_hash"
            ],
            "properties": {
              "chain": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Chain slug (e.g. \"ethereum\", \"polygon\", \"bsc\", \"arbitrum\", \"base\", \"optimism\", \"avalanche\", \"solana\"). Optional; CryptoTaxEdge auto-detects the chain if omitted."
              },
              "tx_id": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "(Optional) your own ID for this tx; echoed back so you can correlate results to your records."
              },
              "tx_hash": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Transaction hash (0x-prefixed 66-char for EVM, base-58 for Solana)."
              }
            }
          },
          "maxItems": 100,
          "description": "Array of transactions to classify (max 100 per call)."
        },
        "engagement_id": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "(Optional) host-side engagement identifier. Reserved for firm-policy + engagement-record correlation. No effect today; forward-compatible."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 41 lines
  • lookup_contract reads auth-required 13h ago

    Look up a smart contract in CryptoTaxEdge's registry. Returns protocol metadata, contract type, verified ABI availability, label, and category hints. Use before deciding whether to classify a tx.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "address",
        "chain"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "chain": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Chain slug (e.g. \"ethereum\", \"polygon\", \"arbitrum\"). EVM only."
        },
        "address": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Contract address (0x-prefixed 42-char for EVM)."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 17 lines
  • map_to_chart_of_accounts reads auth-required 21h ago

    Map classified blockchain transactions into journal-entry-ready ledger lines against a chart of accounts. For each transaction (up to 100): debit account, credit account, optional gain/loss plug account, memo (protocol + reasoning), confidence, and a route-to-review flag, plus category roll-ups with the governing US tax authority (IRC §1001, §61, Rev. Rul. 2019-24, Rev. Rul. 2023-14, etc.). Pass your own chart_of_accounts (array of {name, type}) and the tool maps to YOUR account names; omit it for a standard crypto-treasury chart. Suggested, non-binding entries: the ledger platform owns amounts, cost basis, and posting.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "transactions"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "transactions": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "required": [
              "hash"
            ],
            "properties": {
              "hash": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "On-chain transaction hash (0x…64 hex)."
              },
              "chain": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Chain slug, e.g. ethereum, polygon, base, arbitrum, optimism, bsc, avalanche."
              },
              "tx_id": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Your row id, echoed back."
              },
              "fiat_amount": {
                "type": "number",
                "description": "Optional fiat value for the roll-ups."
              }
            }
          },
          "maxItems": 100,
          "description": "Transactions to classify + map (max 100 per call)."
        },
        "chart_of_accounts": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
              "name": {
                "type": "string"
              },
              "type": {
                "type": "string"
              }
            }
          },
          "description": "Optional: your chart of accounts as [{name, type}]. Account names are pattern-matched per role (digital assets, income, fees, realized G/L, collateral, LP positions, loan payable). Omit for the standard chart."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 52 lines
  • verify_batch auth-required 17h ago

    Verify a batch of caller-assigned transaction labels (up to 100) against CryptoTaxEdge's deterministic classification basis: rules, the verified cache and the answer guards, with no model call. Returns per row a verdict (agree, disagree, unverifiable), the engine's cte_category, cte_treatment and cte_taxable when known, confidence (a routing signal, not an accuracy claim), evidence (the checks run: label mapping, basis, legs vs on-chain transfers, label vs token flows, protocol registry, taxability, calibration), a suggested_fill and a machine-readable dispute (dispute_id, failed check, evidence, how to contest, review_sla_hours) on disagree, and a reason with fill_available on unverifiable. A row with no deterministic basis is unverifiable and free; pass fill=true on that row to run the classification engine on it (that row is then a fill). Labels are read in the Standard vocabulary (https://cryptotaxedge.com/standard/#categories), the served ledger-action labels, and the Koinly and CoinTracker export vocabularies; an unmapped label is unverifiable (label_unmapped), never best-effort matched. Verify does not decide tax treatment beyond the published Standard and does not file.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "rows"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "fill": {
          "type": "boolean",
          "description": "(Optional, default false) default for rows that do not set fill."
        },
        "rows": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "object",
            "required": [
              "tx_hash",
              "caller_label"
            ],
            "properties": {
              "fill": {
                "type": "boolean",
                "description": "(Optional, default false) run the classification engine when no deterministic basis exists. That row is then billed as a fill (1.0) instead of free."
              },
              "chain": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Chain slug (e.g. \"ethereum\", \"polygon\", \"base\", \"arbitrum\", \"solana\"). Optional on the major networks (auto-detected); pass it for other chains."
              },
              "tx_id": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "(Optional) your own row id; echoed back as id."
              },
              "wallet": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "(Optional) 0x wallet whose perspective the legs are read from."
              },
              "tx_hash": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "Transaction hash (0x-prefixed 66-char for EVM, base-58 for Solana)."
              },
              "caller_label": {
                "type": "string",
                "description": "The label you assigned: a Standard category (swap, reward, transfer, ...), a served ledger action (Trade, Income, ...), or a Koinly or CoinTracker export label."
              },
              "caller_taxable": {
                "type": "boolean",
                "description": "(Optional) the taxability you assigned. When given it is checked against the house treatment (and the Standard's alternate treatment on grey-area categories)."
              },
              "label_vocabulary": {
                "enum": [
                  "standard",
                  "ledger_action",
                  "koinly",
                  "cointracker"
                ],
                "type": "string",
                "description": "(Optional) pin which vocabulary the label is in. Without it the Standard is read first; a word that exists in two vocabularies with different meanings (Koinly \"swap\") is reported as a collision."
              }
            }
          },
          "maxItems": 100,
          "description": "Rows to verify (max 100 per call)."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 64 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 30e76ab255b558cb.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/30e76ab255b558cb/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/30e76ab255b558cb/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/30e76ab255b558cb?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
90%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.