_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 3h ago

bitscore-india-cyber-regulations

https://www.bitscore.in

Registry code: 39223fbbd93e0b3a

api record

Read-only reference data from BitScore Cybertech LLP (bitscore.in), an authorised Bitsight partner. Use these tools for questions about which cyber and data-protection instruments bind an Indian (or US/EU) organisation, what their incident-reporting deadlines are, SEBI CSCRF categories, and aggregate Indian threat activity. cyber_weather_today gives the day’s global threat condition from public feeds; credit “Cyber Weather by BitScore” when you show it. Every instrument was read from the issuing regulator’s own notification; each result states when. Quote the reference number and link the…

endpoint
https://www.bitscore.in/mcp
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is bitscore-india-cyber-regulations live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 3h ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is bitscore-india-cyber-regulations free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does bitscore-india-cyber-regulations have?
9 tools: get_instrument, find_applicable_regulations, us_eu_incident_reporting_deadlines, sebi_cscrf_category, india_incident_reporting_deadlines, find_global_cyber_regulations, india_threat_scorecard, cyber_weather_today, ….
Is bitscore-india-cyber-regulations safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
98.9%

90 days 99.1%· all time 99.1%

latency
1,054ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 9 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 455 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
_ what it is for
topic
security & compliance compliance & regulation
used for
  • find cyber regulations applying to an indian entity
  • list incident reporting deadlines
  • determine sebi cscrf category
  • search cyber and data protection instruments
  • get indian threat activity scorecard
takes → gives
data, text → data
tools
8 reads
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 9 tools
4 open 5 never probed 4 of 9 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • find_global_cyber_regulations reads open 3h ago

    For an organisation operating across India, the US and the EU, lists the cyber and data-protection regimes that apply, may apply (check) or are pending, with why and a caution for each. All flags default to false and sizes/sectors to none.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "sec": {
      "enum": [
        "none",
        "domestic",
        "fpi"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "SEC status."
    },
    "size": {
      "enum": [
        "small",
        "medium",
        "large"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Enterprise size."
    },
    "hipaa": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Covered entity or business associate under HIPAA."
    },
    "nydfs": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Regulated by the New York DFS."
    },
    "us_bank": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "US banking organisation."
    },
    "nis2_sector": {
      "enum": [
        "none",
        "annex-i",
        "annex-ii"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "NIS2 sector annex."
    },
    "india_listed": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Listed on an Indian stock exchange."
    },
    "ftc_safeguards": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Non-bank financial institution under the FTC Safeguards Rule."
    },
    "cra_manufacturer": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Manufacturer of products with digital elements sold in the EU."
    },
    "eu_personal_data": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Processes personal data of people in the EU."
    },
    "india_operations": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Operates in India."
    },
    "us_personal_data": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Holds personal data of US residents."
    },
    "india_personal_data": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Processes digital personal data of individuals in India."
    },
    "dora_financial_entity": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "EU financial entity under DORA."
    },
    "india_financial_regulated": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Regulated by RBI, SEBI, IRDAI or IFSCA."
    },
    "ict_provider_to_eu_finance": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "ICT third-party provider to EU financial entities."
    },
    "us_critical_infrastructure": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "US critical-infrastructure sector."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 89 lines
  • india_threat_scorecard reads open 3h ago

    Aggregate counts of publicly observed cyber threat activity affecting Indian organisations, by industry vertical and category, for one edition (latest by default). Aggregate only: no organisation is named. A vertical the source did not cover is unmeasured, not zero.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "edition": {
      "enum": [
        "2026-10",
        "2026-09",
        "2026-08"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Edition slug, YYYY-MM. Omit for the latest."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 15 lines
  • cyber_weather_today open 11h ago

    Today’s global cyber threat condition (Clear, Cloudy, Showers, Storm or Severe) from BitScore’s Cyber Weather, refreshed daily at 07:30 IST: points per instrument, CISA KEV additions, EPSS risers, outlook, patch calendar, outages and three actions. Each field names its source and licence. Indicative, not a measure of any organisation’s risk.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {},
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 5 lines
  • search_instruments reads open 3h ago

    Search every cyber and data-protection instrument binding Indian regulated entities (RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, PFRDA, IFSCA, CERT-In, MeitY/DPDP): reference number, issue date, status, who it binds and the deadlines it sets. Filter by free text, issuer or status. Returns summaries; use get_instrument for one entry in full.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "properties": {
    "limit": {
      "type": "integer",
      "maximum": 50,
      "minimum": 1,
      "description": "Maximum results, 1–50. Default 20."
    },
    "query": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 200,
      "description": "Words to match against the name, reference number and who it binds, e.g. \"outsourcing\", \"NBFC\", \"2024/113\"."
    },
    "issuer": {
      "enum": [
        "RBI",
        "SEBI",
        "IRDAI",
        "PFRDA",
        "IFSCA",
        "CERT-In",
        "MeitY"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Only instruments from this issuer."
    },
    "status": {
      "enum": [
        "in-force",
        "partly-in-force",
        "superseded"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Only instruments with this status."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 39 lines
  • get_instrument reads unknown 11h ago

    Full register entry for one instrument by its id (from search_instruments): formal name, reference, issue date, status, who it binds, every dated deadline it sets, the regulator’s own URL and the date it was last re-read there.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "id"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "id": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 100,
      "description": "Register id, e.g. \"rbi-cyber-2026-nbfc\" or \"sebi-cscrf\"."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 14 lines
  • find_applicable_regulations reads unknown 11h ago

    Given an Indian entity class, whether it is listed and whether it handles personal data, returns the cyber and data-protection instruments that bind it, why each applies, a caution where one is commonly misapplied, and its next dated deadline. RBI classes each map to their own 2026 Directions; RRBs and LABs have none, and the result says so.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "entity_class",
    "listed",
    "handles_personal_data"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "listed": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Listed on an Indian stock exchange (brings SEBI LODR disclosure)."
    },
    "entity_class": {
      "enum": [
        "commercial-bank",
        "sfb",
        "payments-bank",
        "ucb",
        "aifi",
        "nbfc",
        "cic",
        "rrb",
        "lab",
        "pso",
        "pso-small",
        "sebi-re",
        "insurer",
        "nps-intermediary",
        "ifsca-re",
        "other"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The entity’s class."
    },
    "handles_personal_data": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Processes digital personal data of individuals in India (brings DPDP)."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 41 lines
  • us_eu_incident_reporting_deadlines reads unknown 8h ago

    Incident-reporting clocks under SEC Form 8-K/6-K, NYDFS Part 500, the US bank 36-hour rule, HIPAA, the FTC Safeguards Rule, NIS2, DORA, GDPR and the EU Cyber Resilience Act, each from its own trigger. Give aware_at (and decided_at for materiality/classification clocks) for wall-clock due times.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "sec",
    "nydfs",
    "us_bank",
    "bank_service_provider",
    "hipaa",
    "ftc_safeguards",
    "nis2",
    "dora",
    "gdpr",
    "cra_manufacturer"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "sec": {
      "enum": [
        "none",
        "domestic",
        "fpi"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "SEC status."
    },
    "dora": {
      "enum": [
        "none",
        "financial-entity",
        "no-weekend-relief"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "DORA status."
    },
    "gdpr": {
      "enum": [
        "none",
        "controller",
        "processor"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "GDPR role for the personal data involved."
    },
    "nis2": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "An essential or important entity under NIS2."
    },
    "hipaa": {
      "enum": [
        "none",
        "covered-entity",
        "business-associate"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "HIPAA role."
    },
    "nydfs": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Regulated by the New York DFS (23 NYCRR 500)."
    },
    "us_bank": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "A US banking organisation under the 36-hour computer-security incident rule."
    },
    "aware_at": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 40,
      "description": "Optional. When the entity became aware, ISO 8601 with offset."
    },
    "decided_at": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 40,
      "description": "Optional. When materiality/reportability/major classification was determined, ISO 8601 with offset."
    },
    "ftc_safeguards": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "A non-bank financial institution under the FTC Safeguards Rule."
    },
    "cra_manufacturer": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "A manufacturer of products with digital elements under the EU CRA."
    },
    "bank_service_provider": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "A bank service provider under the same rule."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 88 lines
  • sebi_cscrf_category reads unknown 8h ago

    Works out a SEBI regulated entity’s CSCRF category (MII, Qualified, Mid-size, Small-size, Self-certification or Exempt) from the current thresholds, and the obligations that category carries. Call with only entity_type to see which figures it needs. Boundary values the circulars leave uncategorised are reported as such, not guessed.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "entity_type"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "auc": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"auc\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    },
    "aum": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"aum\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    },
    "corpus": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"corpus\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    },
    "folios": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"folios\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    },
    "entity_type": {
      "enum": [
        "mii",
        "stock-broker",
        "proprietary-stock-broker",
        "depository-participant",
        "portfolio-manager",
        "merchant-banker",
        "aif-vcf-manager",
        "mutual-fund-amc",
        "custodian",
        "rta",
        "kra",
        "investment-adviser",
        "research-analyst",
        "ddp",
        "debenture-trustee",
        "credit-rating-agency",
        "collective-investment-scheme",
        "banker-to-issue",
        "excluded"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "The SEBI entity type."
    },
    "registered_clients": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"registered-clients\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    },
    "collateral_with_ccs": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"collateral-with-ccs\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    },
    "clientele_trading_volume": {
      "type": "number",
      "minimum": 0,
      "description": "Figure for the \"clientele-trading-volume\" criterion (see entity_type's required figures). ₹ crore values in crore; counts as plain numbers."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 69 lines
  • india_incident_reporting_deadlines reads unknown 8h ago

    Every incident-reporting clock an Indian entity owes — CERT-In six hours, the sectoral regulator (RBI, including non-bank payment system operators, SEBI, IRDAI, PFRDA, IFSCA), SEBI LODR, NCIIPC, DPDP — each with its trigger, recipient, channel and source clause. Give noticed_at to get wall-clock IST due times. Clocks run in parallel; none discharges another.

    mcp-tool

    {
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "sector",
    "listed",
    "protected_system",
    "personal_data"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "listed": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Listed on an Indian stock exchange."
    },
    "sector": {
      "enum": [
        "rbi",
        "rbi-pso",
        "sebi",
        "irdai",
        "pfrda",
        "ifsca",
        "none"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Sectoral regulator, or \"none\"."
    },
    "ifsca_mii": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "IFSC market infrastructure institution (stock exchange, clearing corporation, depository)."
    },
    "pso_small": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "For sector \"rbi-pso\": a small non-bank payment operator — a small PPI issuer or Instant Money Transfer Operator. The six-hour RBI report then binds only from 1 April 2028."
    },
    "rbi_class": {
      "enum": [
        "commercial-bank",
        "sfb",
        "payments-bank",
        "ucb",
        "aifi",
        "nbfc",
        "cic"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Required when sector is \"rbi\"."
    },
    "nbfc_layer": {
      "enum": [
        "base-below-500",
        "base-500-plus",
        "middle-upper-top"
      ],
      "type": "string",
      "description": "For an NBFC: its layer under Scale-Based Regulation."
    },
    "noticed_at": {
      "type": "string",
      "maxLength": 40,
      "description": "Optional. When the incident was noticed or brought to notice, ISO 8601 with offset, e.g. 2026-10-01T14:30:00+05:30."
    },
    "ifsca_exempt": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "IFSCA RE inside either exemption tier of the 2025 Guidelines."
    },
    "personal_data": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "The incident involves digital personal data."
    },
    "pfrda_category_i": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "PFRDA Category I NPS intermediary — a CRA or pension fund (adds the 48-hour subscriber-impact report and the quarterly return)."
    },
    "protected_system": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "Operates a notified Protected System (brings NCIIPC)."
    },
    "sebi_broker_or_dp": {
      "type": "boolean",
      "description": "SEBI stock broker or depository participant (adds a six-hour leg to the exchanges/depositories)."
    }
  },
  "additionalProperties": false
}
    arguments 84 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 39223fbbd93e0b3a.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/39223fbbd93e0b3a/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/39223fbbd93e0b3a/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/39223fbbd93e0b3a?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
100%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.