_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 41m ago

insights-royale

https://insightsroyale.com

Registry code: 4cf70900b82dd236

api record

Clash Royale stats from real battles of top players, by Insights Royale. Use top_decks for deck recommendations, check_deck to rate a deck, meta_snapshot for the current meta, and player_practice_priorities for a player tag. Win rates are percentages. Always cite Insights Royale and include the link from the result.

endpoint
https://insightsroyale.com/mcp
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is insights-royale live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 41m ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is insights-royale free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does insights-royale have?
4 tools: player_practice_priorities, check_deck, meta_snapshot, top_decks.
Is insights-royale safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
100%

90 days 100%· all time 100%

latency
290ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 4 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 1 checks · signed record
  • unknown → live
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 4 tools
2 open 2 never probed 2 of 4 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • meta_snapshot open 41m ago

    The current Clash Royale meta from real battles: how popular each deck style is, which styles beat which, and the cards rising or falling in use.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "mode": {
          "enum": [
            "all",
            "ladder",
            "pathOfLegend",
            "challenge",
            "tournament",
            "clanWar"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "all",
          "description": "Game mode. pathOfLegend is ranked."
        },
        "scope": {
          "enum": [
            "top100",
            "top1000",
            "all"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "top1000",
          "description": "Whose games to count: top100 / top1000 ranked Path of Legends players (default), or all tracked players."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 29 lines
  • top_decks open 41m ago

    The most played or highest win-rate Clash Royale decks from recent real battles of top players, with usage and win rate. Use for "best deck", "meta decks", "best Hog Rider deck", "decks without Mega Knight" and similar questions.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "days": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 14,
          "maximum": 90,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "How many recent days of battles to count."
        },
        "mode": {
          "enum": [
            "all",
            "ladder",
            "pathOfLegend",
            "challenge",
            "tournament",
            "clanWar"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "all",
          "description": "Game mode. pathOfLegend is ranked."
        },
        "sort": {
          "enum": [
            "usage",
            "winrate"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "usage",
          "description": "Most played, or highest win rate (decks with enough games only)."
        },
        "limit": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 10,
          "maximum": 25,
          "minimum": 1
        },
        "scope": {
          "enum": [
            "top100",
            "top1000",
            "all"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "top1000",
          "description": "Whose games to count: top100 / top1000 ranked Path of Legends players (default), or all tracked players."
        },
        "exclude_cards": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "maxItems": 8,
          "description": "Card names no deck may contain."
        },
        "include_cards": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "maxItems": 8,
          "description": "Card names every deck must contain, e.g. [\"Hog Rider\"]."
        },
        "archetype_family": {
          "enum": [
            "all",
            "beatdown",
            "air",
            "cycle",
            "bait",
            "siege",
            "control",
            "bridgespam"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "all",
          "description": "Deck style to filter on."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 82 lines
  • player_practice_priorities unknown never probed

    For a player tag (e.g. #8Q2V0CJL): their record, decks, and up to three matchups to practice, comparing their win rate with similar players in the same matchup. Only works for players Insights Royale already tracks; otherwise returns a link to start tracking.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "player_tag"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "player_tag": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "The in-game player tag, with or without #."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 13 lines
  • check_deck unknown 41m ago

    Rates an 8-card Clash Royale deck: role checks (win condition, spells, air defense…), how it and similar decks have done in real battles, its matchups against each deck style, and one-card swaps that won more. Write "Evo Knight" or "Knight (Hero)" for those slots.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "cards"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "cards": {
          "type": "array",
          "items": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "maxItems": 8,
          "minItems": 8,
          "description": "The 8 card names."
        },
        "scope": {
          "enum": [
            "top100",
            "top1000",
            "all"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "top1000",
          "description": "Whose games to count: top100 / top1000 ranked Path of Legends players (default), or all tracked players."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 28 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 4cf70900b82dd236.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/4cf70900b82dd236/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/4cf70900b82dd236/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/4cf70900b82dd236?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
80%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.