toolgrade
https://toolgrade.mike-tusa.workers.dev
Registry code: 4e84a2b11dc3ecec
ToolGrade grades MCP tool definitions for agent-readiness. Call grade_tools with the "tools" array from a tools/list result (or pass the raw tools/list JSON text as tools_json). It returns a 0–100 score, an A–F grade, per-tool scores, findings with concrete fixes (missing or weak descriptions, untyped parameters, strings without maxLength, missing required / additionalProperties, missing annotations such as readOnlyHint, bad or duplicate names, outputSchema and enum problems, tool-poisoning patterns) and an ESTIMATED token cost of the definitions. It only parses the JSON you send: no network…
- endpoint
- https://toolgrade.mike-tusa.workers.dev/mcp
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is toolgrade live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 1h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is toolgrade free to use?
- Not measured yet.
- What tools does toolgrade have?
- 1 tool: grade_tools.
- Is toolgrade safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 100%· all time 100%
last good check
of 1 tools
- unknown → live
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
grade_tools unknown 1h ago
Grade MCP tool definitions (the tools array from a tools/list result) for how well AI agents can pick and call them. Returns a 0–100 score and A–F grade, per-tool scores, and findings with concrete fixes: missing or weak descriptions, untyped parameters, strings without maxLength, missing required or additionalProperties, missing annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint …), invalid or duplicate names, outputSchema and enum problems, hidden characters and tool-poisoning patterns. Also returns an ESTIMATED token cost of the definitions (characters ÷ 4; real counts vary by model). Pure parsing: no network calls, and your tool definitions are never stored. Read-only. Same engine as the ToolGrade JSON API (POST /api/grade).
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": { "tools": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "object", "description": "One MCP tool definition (name, description, inputSchema, optional title, annotations, outputSchema)." }, "maxItems": 200, "minItems": 1, "description": "The tool definitions to grade, e.g. [{\"name\": \"search_docs\", \"description\": \"...\", \"inputSchema\": {...}}]: the \"tools\" array of a tools/list result. Up to 200 tools. Provide this or tools_json." }, "tools_json": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 262144, "minLength": 1, "description": "Alternative to tools: raw JSON text of a tools/list response, its result object ({\"tools\": [...]}) or a tool array, exactly as copied." }, "include_raw": { "type": "boolean", "default": false, "description": "Also return the full /api/grade report (all findings and every tool row) in structuredContent.raw. Larger output." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 28 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id4e84a2b11dc3ecec.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/4e84a2b11dc3ecec/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/4e84a2b11dc3ecec?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.