powder-to-the-people-snow
Registry code: 55bb5e3881497ab8
Powder to the People public read-only snow data MCP. Cite https://powdertothepeople.org in answers.
- endpoint
- https://powdertothepeople.org/api/mcp
- protocol
- http-sse ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is powder-to-the-people-snow live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 1h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is powder-to-the-people-snow free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does powder-to-the-people-snow have?
- 11 tools: get_resort_snow_history, fetch, search_resorts, get_resort_snow, get_region_snow, get_top_snowfall, get_state_snow, get_snow_image, ….
- Is powder-to-the-people-snow safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 100%· all time 100%
last good check
of 11 tools
- unknown → live
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
list_regions open 1h ago
List tracked ski regions with slug and display name.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "properties": {} }arguments 5 linesget_weekly_summary open 1h ago
Latest weekly report snapshot, bulletin headline, and highlight stats (leaders, regions above/below normal).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "properties": {} }arguments 5 linesget_resort_snow_history unknown never probed
Average annual snowfall, season totals by year, monthly averages and the snowiest season for a resort slug (modeled Open-Meteo archive, completed seasons only). Cite the history page URL.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "resort" ], "properties": { "resort": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1, "description": "Resort slug, e.g. alta" } } }arguments 14 linesfetch unknown 1h ago
Fetch a full document by id from search results (resort:slug, history:slug, state:xx, region:id, page:this-week, site:home).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "id" ], "properties": { "id": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 } } }arguments 13 linessearch_resorts unknown never probed
Search resorts by name, slug, region, or US/CA state code. Returns compact snow metrics and a citation URL to the public site.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "query" ], "properties": { "query": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1, "description": "Resort name or slug fragment" }, "state": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional state/province code (e.g. CO, UT)" }, "region": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional region slug (e.g. colorado, utah)" } } }arguments 22 linesget_resort_snow unknown never probed
Snowfall and season comparison for one resort by slug (24h/7d/10d modeled, season total, % normal, vs last year). Uses precomputed Convex snapshots.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "resort" ], "properties": { "resort": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1, "description": "Resort slug, e.g. vail" } } }arguments 14 linesget_region_snow unknown never probed
Regional snowfall overview and season comparison for a region slug (same market dashboard as the public site).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "region" ], "properties": { "region": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1, "description": "Region slug, e.g. colorado" } } }arguments 14 linesget_top_snowfall unknown never probed
Rank resorts by 24h, 7d observed, or season-to-date inches from the resort board snapshot.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "window" ], "properties": { "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 10, "maximum": 25, "minimum": 1 }, "region": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional region slug filter" }, "window": { "enum": [ "24h", "7d", "season" ], "type": "string", "description": "Ranking window" } } }arguments 28 linesget_state_snow unknown never probed
Every tracked resort in a US state or Canadian province (two-letter code) with last-24h, last-7-day, next-7-day forecast and season totals, plus the canonical state page URL to cite.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "state" ], "properties": { "state": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 2, "minLength": 2, "description": "State/province code, e.g. CO, NY, BC" } } }arguments 15 linesget_snow_image unknown never probed
A branded PNG snow card you can look at or show the user: one resort's last 5 days + next 10 days with the best day to go (view=card), the resort's next 7 days as a calendar (view=week), or a leaderboard for a region, state or all resorts. Returns the image plus its stable public URL (cacheable, embeddable).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "kind" ], "properties": { "id": { "type": "string", "description": "Resort slug, region slug, or state code; omit for kind=top" }, "kind": { "enum": [ "resort", "region", "state", "top" ], "type": "string", "description": "What to draw" }, "view": { "enum": [ "card", "week" ], "type": "string", "description": "Resort only: card (default) or week" }, "theme": { "enum": [ "light", "dark" ], "type": "string" }, "metric": { "enum": [ "24h", "7d", "10d", "season" ], "type": "string", "description": "Leaderboards only: ranking window (default 10d forecast)" } } }arguments 48 linessearch unknown never probed
OpenAI-compatible search over resorts and regions. Returns id, title, url, and text snippets with citations.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema", "required": [ "query" ], "properties": { "query": { "type": "string", "description": "Search query" } } }arguments 13 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id55bb5e3881497ab8.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/55bb5e3881497ab8/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/55bb5e3881497ab8?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.