demand-radar
Registry code: 601656c3b6a4ded6
Demand Radar mines public App Store data for buildable opportunities. Typical flow: find_unmet_demand (or find_solo_buildable) -> get_opportunity_brief -> generate_app_brief. Tool names here are exactly the names tools/list returns.
- endpoint
- https://minradar.com/mcp
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is demand-radar live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 95% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is demand-radar free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does demand-radar have?
- 8 tools: generate_app_brief, validate_paying_market, explain_method, market_stats, find_solo_buildable, find_unmet_demand, search_open_source_accelerators, get_opportunity_brief.
- Is demand-radar safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 95.4%· all time 95.4%
last good check
of 8 tools
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- used for
- find app store apps with unhappy users
- find opportunities a solo developer can build
- get an evidence brief for an app
- generate a product spec for a coding agent
- takes → gives
- text → data, text
- tools
- 8 reads
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
market_stats reads open 12h ago
Report local data coverage (apps, reviews, chart snapshots) and the last ingest run.
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": {} }arguments 5 linesfind_solo_buildable reads open 16h ago
Find opportunities a single developer can realistically build: clear winnability plus an explicit single-user, local or offline core. Use when solo feasibility is the primary constraint.
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": { "genre": { "type": "string", "description": "Restrict to one App Store category, e.g. Productivity." }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 10, "maximum": 200, "description": "Maximum number of results to return." }, "max_rating": { "type": "number", "description": "Only include apps at or below this average rating, e.g. 4.0." }, "storefront": { "type": "string", "default": "us", "description": "Two-letter App Store region. The value is region identity, never a label." }, "max_rating_count": { "type": "integer", "default": 0, "description": "Optional ceiling to exclude unassailable giants." }, "min_rating_count": { "type": "integer", "default": 5000, "description": "Rating volume is the install proxy. On /api/lens this remains a legacy alias for the scaled value; /api/hotspots uses it literally." }, "include_institutional": { "type": "boolean", "default": false, "description": "Include institution-locked products that a solo dev cannot win." }, "min_rating_count_scaled": { "type": "integer", "default": 5000, "description": "Pre-scaled rating volume filter. /api/lens applies max(300, floor(value / 3)); /api/paying applies max(200, floor(value / 5))." } } }arguments 45 linesfind_unmet_demand reads open 16h ago
Rank App Store opportunities in apps that already have a large user base but whose users are clearly unhappy (unmet demand). Returns a ranked table with tier, score, rating and scale. Use this first when deciding what app to build.
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": { "genre": { "type": "string", "description": "Restrict to one App Store category, e.g. Productivity." }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 10, "maximum": 200, "description": "Maximum number of results to return." }, "max_rating": { "type": "number", "description": "Only include apps at or below this average rating, e.g. 4.0." }, "storefront": { "type": "string", "default": "us", "description": "Two-letter App Store region. The value is region identity, never a label." }, "max_rating_count": { "type": "integer", "default": 0, "description": "Optional ceiling to exclude unassailable giants." }, "min_rating_count": { "type": "integer", "default": 5000, "description": "Rating volume is the install proxy. On /api/lens this remains a legacy alias for the scaled value; /api/hotspots uses it literally." }, "include_institutional": { "type": "boolean", "default": false, "description": "Include institution-locked products that a solo dev cannot win." }, "min_rating_count_scaled": { "type": "integer", "default": 5000, "description": "Pre-scaled rating volume filter. /api/lens applies max(300, floor(value / 3)); /api/paying applies max(200, floor(value / 5))." } } }arguments 45 linessearch_open_source_accelerators reads open 16h ago
Find maintained, commercially reusable open-source projects for a niche, with license posture. Use to avoid rebuilding infrastructure and to check whether a dependency is safe to ship.
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": { "genre": { "type": "string", "description": "Restrict to one App Store category, e.g. Productivity." }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 6, "maximum": 200, "description": "Maximum number of results to return." }, "theme": { "type": "string", "description": "Complaint theme key, e.g. data_loss_sync, paywall_aggressive, ai_quality." } } }arguments 20 linesget_opportunity_brief reads open 12h ago
Full evidence dossier for one app: score breakdown, plain-language diagnosis, complaint themes with verbatim user quotes, review provenance, and matching open-source accelerators. Use after find_low_hanging_fruit to inspect a specific candidate.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "app_id" ], "properties": { "app_id": { "type": "integer", "description": "App Store track id." }, "storefront": { "type": "string", "default": "us", "description": "Two-letter App Store region. The value is region identity, never a label." }, "include_github": { "type": "boolean", "default": true, "description": "MCP name for the REST with_github switch." } } }arguments 22 linesgenerate_app_brief reads unknown never probed
Produce a ready-to-build product specification for an opportunity, formatted for a specific AI coding agent (codex, claude, or cursor). Includes the wedge, the verbatim complaints to fix, verified open-source accelerators, and a verification plan.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "app_id" ], "properties": { "app_id": { "type": "integer", "description": "App Store track id." }, "target": { "enum": [ "codex", "claude", "cursor" ], "type": "string", "default": "codex", "description": "AI coding agent that will receive the brief." }, "storefront": { "type": "string", "default": "us", "description": "Two-letter App Store region. The value is region identity, never a label." } } }arguments 27 linesvalidate_paying_market reads unknown never probed
Rank app categories by evidence that users already pay inside them: how many of its apps reach the store-wide Top-Grossing chart, how many charge upfront, paywall language in sampled reviews, and review depth. Call this before building to confirm a market monetises.
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": { "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 10, "maximum": 200, "description": "Maximum number of results to return." }, "storefront": { "type": "string", "default": "us", "description": "Two-letter App Store region. The value is region identity, never a label." }, "min_rating_count": { "type": "integer", "default": 5000, "description": "Rating volume is the install proxy. On /api/lens this remains a legacy alias for the scaled value; /api/hotspots uses it literally." } } }arguments 22 linesexplain_method reads unknown never probed
Explain the scoring formulas, weights, and the honest limitations of the data. Use when a user questions the numbers.
{ "type": "object", "required": [], "properties": {} }arguments 5 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id601656c3b6a4ded6.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/601656c3b6a4ded6/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/601656c3b6a4ded6?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.