reality-graph-verification-tools
Registry code: 618a743c92cedbe5
Free read-only AI coding verification tools: verification-debt calculator, task-spec lint, search.
from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator
- endpoint
- https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is reality-graph-verification-tools live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 28m ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is reality-graph-verification-tools free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does reality-graph-verification-tools have?
- 10 tools: validate_task_contract, check_release_readiness, fetch, lint_task_spec, check_verification_debt, search, plan_change_verification, calculate_verification_capacity, ….
- Is reality-graph-verification-tools safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 98.6%· all time 98.6%
last good check
of 10 tools
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- topic
- developer tools testing & qa
- used for
- estimate verification debt
- lint a task spec for a coding agent
- check release readiness
- plan verification for a change
- get a task contract template
- takes → gives
- text, data → data, text
- tools
- 10 reads
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
get_verification_report_template reads open 20h ago
Returns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored by the generating model), what was skipped, limitations, and the explicit decision. format='json' for a machine-fillable structure; default is a compact markdown file. Static content, nothing stored. lang='de' for German.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Language (default: en)" }, "format": { "enum": [ "markdown", "json" ], "type": "string", "description": "Template format (default: markdown)" } } }arguments 22 linesget_task_contract_template reads open 20h ago
Returns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions, open questions — with a filled example and fill-in guidance. Write the contract before an AI agent runs; verify the result against it after. format='json' returns a machine-fillable JSON structure; default is a compact markdown skeleton. Set lang='de' for German. Static content, nothing stored.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Language (default: en)" }, "format": { "enum": [ "markdown", "json" ], "type": "string", "description": "Template format (default: markdown)" } } }arguments 22 linesvalidate_task_contract reads unknown 7h ago
Deterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers), automated checks in the validation plan, expected evidence, and leftover placeholders. Returns a verdict (PASS / PASS WITH WARNINGS / FAIL), four dimension scores, and a concrete fix per finding. Validates form and completeness, not correctness. No LLM, nothing stored. lang='de' for German.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "contract" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Report language (default: en)" }, "contract": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 16000, "minLength": 20, "description": "The filled task contract as a JSON string (structure from get_task_contract_template, format='json')" } } }arguments 23 linescheck_release_readiness reads unknown 10h ago
Return GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not inspect code, CI, or a deployment.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "change_summary", "change_types", "blast_radius", "rollback", "acceptance_criteria_passed", "acceptance_criteria_failed", "acceptance_criteria_not_run", "checks", "rollback_ready", "monitoring_ready", "known_limitations_recorded", "independent_review" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Response language (default: en)" }, "checks": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "object", "required": [ "kind", "status" ], "properties": { "kind": { "enum": [ "build", "lint", "typecheck", "unit", "integration", "e2e", "accessibility", "security", "migration", "manual" ], "type": "string" }, "name": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200, "minLength": 1 }, "status": { "enum": [ "pass", "fail", "not_run" ], "type": "string" }, "evidence": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 1000 } } }, "maxItems": 100 }, "rollback": { "enum": [ "automatic", "documented", "manual", "none", "unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Current rollback or recovery state" }, "blast_radius": { "enum": [ "single_component", "service", "multi_service", "customer_data", "production_wide" ], "type": "string", "description": "Largest expected impact boundary" }, "change_types": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "ui", "api", "auth", "database", "payments", "personal_data", "dependency", "infrastructure", "public_api", "compliance" ], "type": "string" }, "maxItems": 10, "minItems": 1, "description": "Technical and risk-relevant change types" }, "change_summary": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 2000, "minLength": 10, "description": "Plain-language summary of the change" }, "rollback_ready": { "type": "boolean" }, "monitoring_ready": { "type": "boolean" }, "independent_review": { "type": "boolean" }, "acceptance_criteria_failed": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 10000, "minimum": 0 }, "acceptance_criteria_passed": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 10000, "minimum": 0 }, "known_limitations_recorded": { "type": "boolean" }, "acceptance_criteria_not_run": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 10000, "minimum": 0 } } }arguments 149 linesfetch reads unknown 28m ago
Fetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the canonical URL.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "id" ], "properties": { "id": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 300, "minLength": 1, "description": "Document id from search results, or a realitygraph.dev URL" } } }arguments 15 lineslint_task_spec reads unknown 28m ago
Check whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance criteria, validation plan) plus rule checks (vague adjectives without numbers, unnamed unhappy paths, missing file anchors). Returns a status table with evidence, the concrete questions that close each gap, and a fill-in skeleton. It checks form, not content — no LLM, nothing stored. Set lang='de' for a German report.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "task" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Report language (default: en)" }, "task": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 8000, "minLength": 10, "description": "The work order / task text you intend to give an AI coding agent (English or German)" } } }arguments 23 linescheck_verification_debt reads unknown 28m ago
Estimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full calculation path, labeled assumptions, thresholds, and sources (GitClear, Sonar, Faros, Veracode). Deterministic arithmetic from published models - no benchmark claims. Only team_size is required; every additional parameter refines the estimate. Set lang='de' for a German report.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "team_size" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Report language (default: en)" }, "team_size": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 500, "minimum": 1, "description": "Number of developers on the team (required)" }, "prs_per_month": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100000, "minimum": 1, "description": "Total merged PRs per month (default: team_size x prs_per_engineer_per_month)" }, "hourly_rate_eur": { "type": "number", "maximum": 1000, "minimum": 1, "description": "Loaded cost per engineer hour in EUR (default: 75, assumption)" }, "ai_share_percent": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0, "description": "Share of merges that are AI-assisted, in percent (default: 60, assumption)" }, "ai_merges_per_month": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100000, "minimum": 0, "description": "AI-assisted merges per month (enables the unverified-merge rate)" }, "merged_loc_per_week": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100000000, "minimum": 0, "description": "Merged changed lines of code per week (enables the GVR and review-depth metrics)" }, "rework_rate_percent": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0, "description": "Share of AI-assisted changes reworked for a defect within 14 days, in percent (default: 2, the illustrative rate from /cost-of-verification-debt - replace it with your own reason-coded rate)" }, "two_week_churn_percent": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0, "description": "Share of new lines revised or reverted within 14 days, in percent. A warning signal in the metrics block; it never enters the cost model, because it measures lines and the cost model counts changes" }, "reviewer_hours_per_week": { "type": "number", "maximum": 10000, "minimum": 0, "description": "Reviewer hours actually spent per week (enables the GVR metric)" }, "hours_per_reworked_change": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0.1, "description": "Average hours per reworked change (default: 6, assumption)" }, "prs_per_engineer_per_month": { "type": "number", "maximum": 500, "minimum": 0.1, "description": "Merged PRs per engineer per month (default: 20, derived from the published worked report on /measure-verification-debt)" }, "incident_allowance_eur_per_year": { "type": "number", "maximum": 10000000, "minimum": 0, "description": "Annual incident allowance in EUR (default: 0; add one only when you have a locally defined incident class, frequency and expected-loss method)" }, "ai_merges_with_evidence_per_month": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100000, "minimum": 0, "description": "AI-assisted merges per month with recorded validation evidence (enables the unverified-merge rate)" }, "review_reconstruction_hours_per_pr": { "type": "number", "maximum": 20, "minimum": 0, "description": "Average reviewer hours spent reconstructing intent per AI-assisted PR (default: 0.5, assumption)" }, "substantive_review_comments_per_week": { "type": "number", "maximum": 1000000, "minimum": 0, "description": "Substantive review comments per week, excluding bots and nitpicks (enables the review-depth metric)" } } }arguments 107 linessearch reads unknown 10h ago
Full-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking, EU compliance (EU AI Act, GDPR, NIS2), and AI coding governance — in English and German. Returns matching documents with title, URL, and snippet. Use fetch to read a result.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "query" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Restrict results to one language (default: both)" }, "query": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 300, "minLength": 2, "description": "Search query (English or German)" } } }arguments 23 linesplan_change_verification reads unknown 20h ago
Turn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect code and never invents a confidence score.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "change_summary", "change_types", "blast_radius", "rollback" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Response language (default: en)" }, "rollback": { "enum": [ "automatic", "documented", "manual", "none", "unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Current rollback or recovery state" }, "blast_radius": { "enum": [ "single_component", "service", "multi_service", "customer_data", "production_wide" ], "type": "string", "description": "Largest expected impact boundary" }, "change_types": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "ui", "api", "auth", "database", "payments", "personal_data", "dependency", "infrastructure", "public_api", "compliance" ], "type": "string" }, "maxItems": 10, "minItems": 1, "description": "Technical and risk-relevant change types" }, "change_summary": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 2000, "minLength": 10, "description": "Plain-language summary of the change" } } }arguments 69 linescalculate_verification_capacity reads unknown 10h ago
Calculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the arithmetic and a concrete balancing action.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "ai_changes_per_week", "average_review_minutes_per_change", "available_reviewer_hours_per_week", "evidence_coverage_percent" ], "properties": { "lang": { "enum": [ "en", "de" ], "type": "string", "description": "Response language (default: en)" }, "ai_changes_per_week": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 1000000, "minimum": 0 }, "two_week_churn_percent": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0 }, "evidence_coverage_percent": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0 }, "available_reviewer_hours_per_week": { "type": "number", "maximum": 100000, "minimum": 0 }, "average_review_minutes_per_change": { "type": "number", "maximum": 10000, "minimum": 0.1 } } }arguments 45 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id618a743c92cedbe5.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/618a743c92cedbe5/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/618a743c92cedbe5?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.