fitllm
Registry code: 6e462f334e5256d2
Will this LLM fit on your GPU, multi-GPU rig or Mac? Exact VRAM & KV-cache math. Read-only.
from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator
- endpoint
- https://fitllm.run/api/mcp
- protocol
- http-sse ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is fitllm live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 7h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is fitllm free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does fitllm have?
- 3 tools: check_llm_fit, what_fits_on_hardware, list_supported.
- Is fitllm safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 99.7%· all time 99.7%
last good check
of 3 tools
- degraded → live
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- unknown → live
- topic
- ai & agents
- used for
- check if a local llm fits on a gpu
- rank llms that fit on hardware
- list supported models and gpus
- takes → gives
- data → data
- tools
- 3 reads
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
what_fits_on_hardware reads open 28h ago
Rank which popular local LLMs fit on a given GPU or Apple Silicon Mac (at ~4-bit quantization, 8K context) — models that fit come first, biggest first, with max context each. Use when a user asks "what can I run on my <GPU/Mac/N GB>?", "best local model for my machine?", or gives hardware without naming a model.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "properties": { "gpu": { "type": "string", "description": "GPU name, fuzzy. Multi-GPU rigs: join with + (e.g. \"RTX 5090 + RTX 3090\"). Provide gpu OR mac_ram_gb." }, "gpu_count": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 8, "minimum": 1, "description": "Number of identical copies of the gpu. Default 1." }, "mac_ram_gb": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 2048, "minimum": 8, "description": "Apple Silicon unified memory GB. Provide gpu OR mac_ram_gb." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 23 lineslist_supported reads open 28h ago
List the built-in model names and hardware names this fit-checker knows (for mapping user wording to exact names). Standard text-only HuggingFace transformer configs can also be checked via fitllm.run; unsupported architectures are rejected.
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "properties": {} }arguments 5 linescheck_llm_fit reads unknown 28h ago
Check whether a specific local LLM fits in the memory of a specific GPU or Apple Silicon Mac. Returns fits/tight/won't-fit verdict with the memory breakdown (weights, KV cache, linear-attention state when present, runtime overhead, reserve), max context, and a concrete fix if it doesn't fit. Use this whenever a user asks anything like "can I run <model> on my <GPU/Mac>?", "will <model> fit in <N>GB?", or "what do I need to run <model>?". Estimates using curated, config-derived architecture fields (MLA, sliding-window, hybrid attention, MoE modeled).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "model" ], "properties": { "ctx": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1024, "description": "Alias of context_tokens — accepted because the REST API uses this name. Do not pass both with different values." }, "env": { "enum": [ "linux-headless", "linux-display", "windows-display" ], "type": "string", "description": "Discrete-GPU OS reserve: windows-display (default, 2 GB/card) · linux-display (1.2 GB) · linux-headless (0.6 GB, a second card with no display). Not for Macs or DGX Spark-class systems." }, "gpu": { "type": "string", "description": "GPU name, fuzzy — e.g. \"RTX 4090\", \"RX 7900 XTX\", \"A100 80GB\". Multi-GPU rigs: join with + — e.g. \"RTX 5090 + RTX 3090\" (VRAM pools across cards). Provide gpu OR mac_ram_gb." }, "model": { "type": "string", "description": "LLM name, fuzzy — e.g. \"GLM-4.7-Flash\", \"gpt-oss-20b\", \"gemma 31b\"" }, "quant": { "type": "string", "description": "Weight quantization. GPU: Q4_K_M(default)/Q5_K_M/Q6_K/Q8_0/FP16. Mac: 4/8(default)/16 (bits)." }, "kv_bits": { "enum": [ 16, 8, 4 ], "type": "number", "description": "KV-cache quantization bits (default 16 = F16)" }, "gpu_count": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 8, "minimum": 1, "description": "Number of identical copies of the gpu (e.g. gpu=\"RTX 3090\", gpu_count=2 for a 2×3090 rig; gpu=\"DGX Spark 128GB\", gpu_count=2 or 4 for linked units under vLLM+Ray or TensorRT-LLM). Default 1." }, "mac_ram_gb": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 2048, "minimum": 8, "description": "Apple Silicon unified memory in GB — e.g. 16, 64, 512. Provide gpu OR mac_ram_gb." }, "context_tokens": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1024, "description": "Context length in tokens (default 8192). Alias: ctx (same field as the REST API)." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 62 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id6e462f334e5256d2.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/6e462f334e5256d2/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/6e462f334e5256d2?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.