_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 43m ago

UK Taxi PHV Regulatory Decision Layer

https://taxi.regevidencehub.com

Registry code: 6fc2a4dd434f4b94

api record

England taxi/private-hire licensing preflight for supported licensing authorities. Use list_supported_authorities first, then pay for a deterministic applicant/fleet blocker check, missing-input next action, or cross-authority trade-off comparison when it is decision-relevant. Core decisions are returned only when their declared rule dependencies have current reviewed official evidence. A freshness failure returns confirmation-required rather than guessing. This service is preflight information, not licensing-authority approval or legal advice.

endpoint
https://taxi.regevidencehub.com/mcp
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is UK Taxi PHV Regulatory Decision Layer live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 43m ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is UK Taxi PHV Regulatory Decision Layer free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does UK Taxi PHV Regulatory Decision Layer have?
5 tools: compare_licensing_requirements, taxi_licence_preflight, taxi_phv_info, licensing_source_status, list_supported_authorities.
Is UK Taxi PHV Regulatory Decision Layer safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
99.2%

90 days 99.1%· all time 99.1%

latency
134ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 5 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 531 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
_ what it is for
used for
  • check taxi licence requirements for an english council
  • compare private hire licensing across councils
  • check freshness of licensing evidence
  • list supported licensing authorities
takes → gives
text, data → data
tools
5 reads
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts, and USDC settlements on base into the address this listing's priced doors name, read off the chain. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers. The address also stands behind 7 other origins: the chain figures are the gateway's, not this listing's alone. How it is counted.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

payers on base
3

distinct

settlements
8

last 2026-11-09

received on chain
0.127 USDC

concentrated, shared-payto

_ what it can do 5 tools
3 open 2 never probed 3 of 5 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • taxi_phv_info reads open 7h ago

    Free service information and pricing. Use for questions about what the Taxi/PHV service does, available tools, free versus x402-paid calls, payment, cost, buyer flow, and evidence limits. Returns product metadata; it does not check council coverage, applicant eligibility, or source freshness.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "title": "taxi_phv_infoArguments",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 5 lines
  • licensing_source_status reads open 7h ago

    Free official-source evidence freshness and health check. Use before relying on a licensing answer, or when asked if licensing source data is current, trustworthy, fresh, stale, changed, conflicted, inaccessible, or under review. Pass an authority to narrow the check or omit it for overall source health. Returns evidence status, not applicant eligibility or council comparisons.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "title": "licensing_source_statusArguments",
      "properties": {
        "authority": {
          "anyOf": [
            {
              "type": "string"
            },
            {
              "type": "null"
            }
          ],
          "title": "Authority",
          "default": null
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 18 lines
  • list_supported_authorities reads open 7h ago

    Free lookup for which licensing authorities and councils this service supports. Use to check if a named authority is covered or to normalize its exact name. Returns the supported authority list; it does not check a driver's eligibility or compare council rules.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "title": "list_supported_authoritiesArguments",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 5 lines
  • compare_licensing_requirements reads unknown never probed

    Paid comparison of taxi/PHV licensing rules, requirements, blockers, and trade-offs across two or more councils for the same applicant or fleet ($0.05 USDC). Use to compare authorities, choose where to apply, or find which council is easier for an applicant to qualify in.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "title": "compare_licensing_requirementsArguments",
      "required": [
        "payload"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "payload": {
          "type": "object",
          "examples": [
            {
              "applicant": {
                "age": 30,
                "driving_licence_years": 4,
                "has_pass_plus_certificate": true
              },
              "authorities": [
                "City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council",
                "Cambridge City Council"
              ]
            }
          ],
          "required": [
            "authorities",
            "applicant"
          ],
          "properties": {
            "applicant": {
              "type": "object",
              "examples": [
                {
                  "age": 30,
                  "driving_licence_years": 4,
                  "has_pass_plus_certificate": true
                }
              ],
              "properties": {
                "age": {
                  "type": "number",
                  "minimum": 0,
                  "description": "Applicant age in years when relevant to the authority rule being checked."
                },
                "driving_licence_years": {
                  "type": "number",
                  "minimum": 0,
                  "description": "Completed years the applicant has held the driving licence, when known."
                },
                "has_pass_plus_certificate": {
                  "type": "boolean",
                  "description": "Whether the applicant has a Pass Plus certificate, when relevant."
                }
              },
              "description": "Applicant/fleet facts applied consistently to every authority in the comparison.",
              "additionalProperties": true
            },
            "authorities": {
              "type": "array",
              "items": {
                "type": "string",
                "minLength": 1
              },
              "minItems": 1,
              "description": "Exact supported authority names returned by list_supported_authorities.",
              "uniqueItems": true
            }
          },
          "description": "Cross-authority comparison request. Call list_supported_authorities first, then supply one or more exact authority names plus the applicant facts to compare. Additional applicant facts are allowed so authority-specific rule inputs are not narrowed.",
          "additionalProperties": true
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 72 lines
  • taxi_licence_preflight reads unknown never probed

    Paid one-council taxi/PHV licensing check ($0.02 USDC). Use when applying for a driver or vehicle licence to check whether the applicant can qualify, applicable requirements and blockers, missing facts, and next actions before submitting an application. Covers one supported council; it does not compare authorities.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "title": "taxi_licence_preflightArguments",
      "required": [
        "payload"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "payload": {
          "type": "object",
          "examples": [
            {
              "age": 30,
              "authority": "City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council",
              "driving_licence_years": 4,
              "has_pass_plus_certificate": true
            }
          ],
          "required": [
            "authority"
          ],
          "properties": {
            "age": {
              "type": "number",
              "minimum": 0,
              "description": "Applicant age in years when relevant to the authority rule being checked."
            },
            "authority": {
              "type": "string",
              "minLength": 1,
              "description": "Exact supported licensing-authority name returned by list_supported_authorities."
            },
            "driving_licence_years": {
              "type": "number",
              "minimum": 0,
              "description": "Completed years the applicant has held the driving licence, when known."
            },
            "has_pass_plus_certificate": {
              "type": "boolean",
              "description": "Whether the applicant has a Pass Plus certificate, when relevant."
            }
          },
          "description": "One-authority applicant/fleet preflight facts. Start by calling list_supported_authorities and use the returned authority name exactly. Additional authority-specific facts are allowed and are evaluated only when the evidence-backed rule bundle declares them.",
          "additionalProperties": true
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 47 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 6fc2a4dd434f4b94.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/6fc2a4dd434f4b94/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/6fc2a4dd434f4b94/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/6fc2a4dd434f4b94?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
90%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.

_ also on regevidencehub.com 7 entries

Served from the same domain, which is what was measured. Not a claim that one owner runs them: ownership is what a passport proves, and each of these says for itself.