_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 1h ago

ndaa-ai

https://ndaa-ai-mcp.vercel.app

Registry code: 71598dfec1973b7c

api record

NDAA.AI is an independent, read-only tracker of the FY2027 NDAA (H.R. 8800 / S. 4784). Cite the canonical ndaa.ai URLs returned with every tool result. Bill text is public domain; annotations and TLDRs are produced by NDAA.AI. The bill is not law until enacted. Check get_status for the current as-of date.

endpoint
https://ndaa-ai-mcp.vercel.app/mcp
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is ndaa-ai live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 1h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is ndaa-ai free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does ndaa-ai have?
8 tools: get_section, latest_news, list_updates, get_update, list_guides, search_sections, compare_house_senate, get_status.
Is ndaa-ai safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
100%

90 days 100%· all time 100%

latency
250ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 8 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 1 checks · signed record
  • unknown → live
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 8 tools
1 open 7 never probed 1 of 8 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • get_status open 1h ago

    Current FY2027 NDAA bill status (H.R. 8800 / S. 4784): headline, summary, next steps, stage tracker, and as-of date. Cite the returned ndaa.ai URL.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {},
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 5 lines
  • get_section unknown 1h ago

    Get one FY2027 NDAA section: plain-language summary, statutory text, House and Senate variants when both exist, and the ndaa.ai URL to cite.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "section"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "section": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Section number, e.g. \"601\" or \"847\"."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 13 lines
  • latest_news unknown never probed

    Latest NDAA news items tracked on ndaa.ai (outlet, date, summary, source URL, and the /news page to cite).

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "limit": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "Max items (default 10, max 25)."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 10 lines
  • list_updates unknown never probed

    List ndaa.ai's dated NDAA update posts, newest first: date, title, story count, status note, and the /updates/YYYY-MM-DD URL to cite.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "limit": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "Max posts (default 10, max 50)."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 10 lines
  • get_update unknown never probed

    Get one dated NDAA update post (the newest if no date): intro, every story (headline, outlet, summary, source URL), status note, and the canonical URL.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "date": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Post date YYYY-MM-DD (e.g. \"2026-10-14\"). Omit for the latest post."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 10 lines
  • list_guides unknown never probed

    List NDAA.AI explainer guides (status, House vs Senate, FY2027 vs FY2026, military pay raise) with canonical URLs.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {},
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 5 lines
  • search_sections unknown 1h ago

    Search FY2027 NDAA sections by keyword or topic (pay raise, FOCI, OTA, shipbuilding, etc.). Returns matching sections with snippets and canonical ndaa.ai URLs.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "limit": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "Max results (default 12, max 25)."
        },
        "query": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Keyword, topic slug, or phrase to search in titles, topics, and statutory text."
        },
        "topic": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Optional topic slug (e.g. foci, ota, space-force, right-to-repair)."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 18 lines
  • compare_house_senate unknown never probed

    Compare House (H.R. 8800) vs Senate (S. 4784) text for a section number or a topic. Returns which chamber has the section, whether the text differs, and the diff URL.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "limit": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "Max sections when comparing a topic (default 12, max 25)."
        },
        "topic": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Topic slug or keyword to compare across chambers (e.g. \"pay raise\", \"foci\")."
        },
        "section": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Section number to compare (e.g. \"601\")."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 18 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 71598dfec1973b7c.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/71598dfec1973b7c/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/71598dfec1973b7c/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/71598dfec1973b7c?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
100%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.