realworldapis
https://realworldapis-api.realworldapis.workers.dev
Registry code: 8fa5d53f9cd76da8
Choose tools by intent: find_api_for_task for an open-ended natural-language task; search_apis for API-level filters; search_capabilities for capability-level execution/access/safety filters; verify_requirement for evidence-backed YES/NO/PARTIAL/UNKNOWN adjudication of one API against one requirement; get_api for one full API decision profile; compare_apis for 2–8 known candidates. All tools are read-only. The canonical structured data and Verified/High capability graph are authoritative and Unknown remains Unknown.
- endpoint
- https://realworldapis-api.realworldapis.workers.dev/mcp
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is realworldapis live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is realworldapis free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does realworldapis have?
- 6 tools: compare_apis, find_api_for_task, get_api, verify_requirement, search_apis, search_capabilities.
- Is realworldapis safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 99.6%· all time 99.6%
last good check
of 6 tools
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- used for
- find apis for a physical world task
- compare apis
- verify an api meets a requirement
- search api capabilities
- takes → gives
- text → data
- tools
- 6 reads
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
search_apis reads open 24h ago
Search the canonical registry when you already know keywords or exact requirements. All supplied filter groups combine with AND logic; array capability filters require every supplied value, and protocol fields match the exact Yes/No/Unknown status, so Unknown never satisfies Yes. Results include each API's capability_summary and direct decision-profile URL. Results are sorted by agent_readiness_score descending and then API name, with 1–20 results returned (default 10). Use search_capabilities when you need capability-level filters such as approval, physical consequence, sandbox or access friction.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "a2a": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Exact A2A evidence status required for a match." }, "mcp": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Exact MCP evidence status required for a match." }, "x402": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Exact x402 evidence status required for a match." }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 10, "maximum": 20, "minimum": 1, "description": "Maximum number of matching records returned. Results are sorted by readiness descending then API name. total_matches still reports the full count. No pagination is currently exposed." }, "query": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 300, "description": "Optional case-insensitive text search across API name, provider, category, description, capabilities, agent capabilities and authentication fields." }, "openapi": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Exact OpenAPI evidence status required for a match." }, "llms_txt": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "Exact llms.txt evidence status required for a match." }, "categories": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact category names. Supplying multiple category values allows a record to match any listed category; this category condition still combines with every other supplied filter group using AND logic." }, "capabilities": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Capability terms that must all be present in the record's verified capabilities. Matching is case-insensitive and allows a capability string to contain the supplied term." }, "min_readiness": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0, "description": "Strict minimum agent-readiness score. Records below this score are excluded." }, "agent_actionable": { "type": "boolean", "description": "When true, require agent_actionable = true. False does not exclude actionable records; omit this field unless you need the positive requirement." }, "agent_capabilities": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "observe", "locate", "predict", "plan", "control", "act" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Agent capability dimensions that must all be explicitly present on a record." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 102 linessearch_capabilities reads open 24h ago
Search the canonical 770-capability Verified/High decision graph directly. Use this when the question is about what an agent can actually do and under what execution conditions: task/capability text, API, category, action type, acted-on object, human approval, physical consequence, irreversibility, sandbox, hardware dependency, access friction or setup. All supplied filter groups combine with AND logic; multiple values inside one array filter are alternatives (OR). Unknown remains Unknown and may be filtered explicitly by passing the literal value Unknown.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 20, "maximum": 50, "minimum": 1, "description": "Maximum capability rows returned. total_matches reports the full match count." }, "query": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 300, "description": "Optional case-insensitive text search across API/provider/category, capability key/name, primitive/action type, object, execution fields and constraints. Search terms may match across different capability fields; all supplied terms must be present somewhere in the capability record." }, "object": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200, "description": "Case-insensitive substring match on the object acted upon, such as smart lock, parcel or charging session." }, "sandbox": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact sandbox/test-environment labels, including Unknown when desired." }, "api_slugs": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Optional API slugs. Multiple values are OR within this filter." }, "categories": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact category labels. Multiple values are OR within this filter." }, "primitives": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact capability primitives such as Observe, Locate, Predict, Plan, Control or Act." }, "agent_setup": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact agent-setup labels such as Fully self-service or Human setup required." }, "action_types": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact action types such as Read, Search, Analyze, Route or Control." }, "actionability": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact actionability labels such as Information only, Planning or Physical action." }, "human_approval": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact approval labels, for example Required, Not required, Depends on action or Unknown." }, "access_friction": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact access-friction labels such as Self-service signup, Sales contract or Hardware ecosystem." }, "hardware_dependency": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Exact hardware-dependency labels." }, "physical_consequence": { "type": "boolean", "description": "When supplied, require the exact physical-consequence boolean." }, "irreversible_high_consequence": { "type": "boolean", "description": "When supplied, require the exact irreversible/high-consequence boolean." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 101 linescompare_apis reads unknown 24h ago
Compare 2–8 already-known APIs side by side using canonical catalog fields plus capability-graph summary fields such as verified capability count, physical consequences, approval relevance and irreversibility. Use get_api for the full decision profile of one API and search_capabilities for capability-level filtering. No missing value is inferred and Unknown remains Unknown.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "apis" ], "properties": { "apis": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "maxItems": 8, "minItems": 2, "description": "Required list of 2–8 API slugs or names. Exact matches are preferred; unique partial matches are accepted. Unresolved identifiers are reported separately, and the call fails if fewer than two records resolve." }, "fields": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "provider", "category", "description", "capabilities", "agent_capabilities", "auth_methods", "openapi", "mcp", "a2a", "x402", "llms_txt", "agent_readiness_score", "public_documentation", "authentication_verified", "agent_actionable", "website", "docs_url", "verified_capability_count", "information_only_count", "physical_consequence_count", "irreversible_high_consequence_count", "approval_relevant_count", "capability_profile_url" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Optional fields to compare. The default includes core catalog fields plus verified capability count, physical-consequence count, approval-relevant count, irreversible/high-consequence count and the decision-profile URL.", "uniqueItems": true } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 51 linesfind_api_for_task reads unknown 12h ago
Find the best APIs for a natural-language physical-world task. Use this for open-ended task or outcome-based recommendations; use search_apis when you already know exact filters, get_api for one known API, or compare_apis for known candidates. Returns an authoritative canonical structured_results shortlist plus a best-effort AI comparison restricted to that shortlist. The canonical engine now applies Verified/High capability evidence before ranking: explicit hard requirements expressed with terms such as must, required, no or without can exclude a candidate only when verified evidence contradicts them. Unknown evidence remains eligible and is surfaced as uncertainty. requirements.mcp, openapi and auth are translated into explicit requirements; categories and capabilities remain task-shaping hints. free_tier and min_readiness are accepted for compatibility but are not hard filters.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "task" ], "properties": { "task": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 1000, "description": "Required natural-language goal or workflow, for example 'connect to a car and predict weather on the route'. Describe the desired outcome rather than naming a specific API." }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "default": 5, "maximum": 5, "minimum": 1, "description": "Backward-compatible parameter. The canonical browser-parity workflow always produces five structured candidates before the AI comparison, even when another value is supplied." }, "requirements": { "type": "object", "properties": { "mcp": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "When set to Yes, becomes an explicit 'Must support MCP' requirement. Verified No excludes; Unknown remains eligible with an uncertainty. Use search_apis for exact status filtering." }, "auth": { "enum": [ "none", "api_key", "oauth", "client_credentials", "bearer", "jwt", "basic" ], "type": "string", "description": "Authentication requirement appended as an explicit task requirement. The canonical engine excludes only when the verified API authentication methods contradict it." }, "openapi": { "enum": [ "Yes", "No", "Unknown" ], "type": "string", "description": "When set to Yes, becomes an explicit OpenAPI requirement. Verified No excludes; Unknown remains eligible with an uncertainty. Use search_apis for exact status filtering." }, "free_tier": { "type": "boolean", "description": "Backward-compatible field only. The canonical recommendation engine does not currently hard-filter on free-tier availability." }, "categories": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Preferred catalog categories, such as Geospatial, Weather or Mobility. These are ranking hints, not strict filters." }, "capabilities": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "observe", "locate", "predict", "plan", "control", "act" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Desired agent capability dimensions. These are appended as ranking hints, not strict filters." }, "min_readiness": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 0, "description": "Backward-compatible field only. It does not hard-filter the canonical top five; use search_apis for a strict minimum readiness threshold." } }, "description": "Optional task requirements appended before canonical ranking. categories and capabilities shape task intent. mcp=Yes, openapi=Yes and auth are expressed as hard task requirements and are evaluated against verified evidence; Unknown does not count as a confirmed contradiction and remains eligible with an uncertainty. free_tier and min_readiness are accepted for backward compatibility but are not hard filters.", "additionalProperties": false } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 91 linesget_api reads unknown 12h ago
Retrieve one canonical API decision profile when you already know its name or slug. The response includes the full Verified/High capability profile with execution, access, approval, reversibility, physical-consequence and evidence fields. Exact slug or exact API name is preferred; a partial identifier is accepted only when it uniquely resolves to one record.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "identifier" ], "properties": { "identifier": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200, "description": "Required API slug or API name. Exact matches are preferred; a unique case-insensitive partial slug/name match is accepted. If it is ambiguous or missing, use search_apis to find the exact identifier." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 14 linesverify_requirement reads unknown 12h ago
Verify whether one specific API can satisfy one exact requirement using the canonical Verified/High capability graph plus linked assertion evidence. Returns YES, NO, PARTIAL or UNKNOWN with matched capability, access/setup prerequisites, approval, safety, reversibility, reliability, coverage and other requested dimensions; direct provider facts remain distinct from inferred policy assertions. Unknown remains Unknown.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "api", "requirement" ], "properties": { "api": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200, "description": "Exact API slug or API name, for example nuki-web-api or Nuki Web API." }, "location": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 200, "description": "Optional geographic coverage requirement, for example Sweden. Coverage is returned as Unknown/Partial when the normalized capability graph does not contain enough location evidence." }, "requirement": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 1000, "description": "Specific requirement to verify, for example 'remotely unlock a smart lock without human approval'." } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 25 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id8fa5d53f9cd76da8.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/8fa5d53f9cd76da8/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/8fa5d53f9cd76da8?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 1
- ok
- 1
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- 100%
- median latency
- 637ms
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
1 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.