skuit-catalog
Registry code: ad99602d114a1df4
AI helper for choosing and speccing network & security products from Cisco, Arista, Juniper and more
from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator
- endpoint
- https://mcp.skuit.ai/api/mcp/catalog
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is skuit-catalog live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 1h ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is skuit-catalog free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does skuit-catalog have?
- 3 tools: catalog_get_platform, catalog_search_platforms, catalog_find_alternatives.
- Is skuit-catalog safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 98.8%· all time 98.8%
last good check
of 3 tools
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- degraded → live
- live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
- unknown → live
- used for
- find network switch platforms for a port demand
- find alternatives to a network product
- get platform specs
- takes → gives
- text → data
- tools
- 3 reads
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Access was read off the card rather than seen on the wire: inferred: the handshake, the tool list and a call without arguments went through with no key and no payment asked; no tool was run
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
catalog_get_platform reads unknown 23h ago
Get the published facts for one platform by its exact platform id (as returned by the other catalog tools). Answers carry catalog_url (the public catalog page) and build_bom_url (Open in SKUit to build a full bill of materials; the builder requires a SKUit account).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "platform_id" ], "properties": { "platform_id": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 100, "minLength": 1, "description": "The exact platform id, e.g. \"C9300X-48HX\"." } } }arguments 15 linescatalog_search_platforms reads unknown 23h ago
Find published platforms that can serve a port demand (for example 60×100G plus 4×400G for a data-center top-of-rack switch), closest fit first: fewest spare ports, then fewest rack units, then least capacity headroom. Each result explains the fit and lists caveats (breakout cables, a non-default port mode, port-pairing rules) that you should pass on to the user. Also reports how many platforms of the use case meet the demand, how many could not be evaluated, and the nearest misses when nothing fits. Answers carry catalog_url (the public catalog page) and build_bom_url (Open in SKUit to build a full bill of materials; the builder requires a SKUit account).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "use_case_id", "port_requirements" ], "properties": { "limit": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 10, "minimum": 1, "description": "How many results (default 5, max 10)." }, "vendors": { "type": "array", "items": { "anyOf": [ { "enum": [ "Arista", "Cisco", "F5", "Juniper Networks", "NVIDIA", "Nokia" ], "type": "string" }, { "type": "string", "maxLength": 60, "minLength": 1 } ] }, "maxItems": 10, "minItems": 1, "description": "Only these vendors. Case-insensitive, on whole words: \"Juniper\" matches \"Juniper Networks\". An unknown name is reported back with the vendors that do have platforms for the use case." }, "form_factor": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 40, "minLength": 1, "description": "Only this form factor, e.g. \"fixed\" or \"modular\"." }, "use_case_id": { "enum": [ "campus-access", "dc-tor", "dc-core", "wan-edge", "smb", "campus-dist", "load-balancer", "ai-fabric" ], "type": "string", "description": "Deployment role: \"campus-access\" (Campus access layer), \"dc-tor\" (ToR & Leaf), \"dc-core\" (DC core / spine), \"wan-edge\" (WAN edge / branch), \"smb\" (SMB / small campus), \"campus-dist\" (Campus distribution), \"load-balancer\" (Security Appliances), \"ai-fabric\" (AI fabric)." }, "poe_required": { "type": "boolean", "description": "Only platforms that supply PoE." }, "max_rack_units": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 64, "minimum": 1, "description": "Only platforms at most this many rack units tall." }, "port_requirements": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "object", "required": [ "count", "speed_gbps" ], "properties": { "count": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 10000, "minimum": 1, "description": "How many ports at this speed." }, "speed_gbps": { "type": "number", "maximum": 1600, "description": "Port speed in Gbps, e.g. 1, 2.5, 10, 25, 100, 400.", "exclusiveMinimum": 0 } } }, "maxItems": 8, "minItems": 1, "description": "The ports needed, one row per speed." } } }arguments 99 linescatalog_find_alternatives reads unknown 23h ago
Find published alternatives to a product named by part number or family (for example "Cisco 9300X" or "C9300X-48HX"): one class up, the same class, and one class down, all in the same role, same vendor first. Each alternative states the single dimension it was compared on, so present it as "comparable on <dimension>", not as a drop-in replacement. An ambiguous name returns the candidate families to choose from. Answers carry catalog_url (the public catalog page) and build_bom_url (Open in SKUit to build a full bill of materials; the builder requires a SKUit account).
{ "type": "object", "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#", "required": [ "product" ], "properties": { "product": { "type": "string", "maxLength": 100, "minLength": 1, "description": "A part number or a product family name, optionally prefixed by the vendor." } } }arguments 15 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's idad99602d114a1df4.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/ad99602d114a1df4/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/ad99602d114a1df4?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.
Served from the same domain, which is what was measured. Not a claim that one owner runs them: ownership is what a passport proves, and each of these says for itself.
- skuit.ai skuit.ai