_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 27m ago

qsimhealth-v1

https://qsimhealth.com

Registry code: c3d15b2f8cbba05a

api record

QSimHealth is a free MD-only MCP demo from ChiAha for healthcare staffing intuition, run by ChiAha (https://qsimhealth.com). Seven tools. Live engine runs (each call runs the ChiAha clinic engine on the inputs you pass): simulate_ed_demo for a 7-day MD-only demo, and recommend_md_count for the inverse problem (smallest MD count meeting a wait-time target). Text only, no simulation: explain_ed_queueing / explain_walk_in_clinic / explain_appointment_office for textbook-level dynamics, list_facility_types + describe_facility for facility-archetype detail.**DEMO SCOPE: MD-only staffing, flat…

endpoint
https://qsimhealth.com/mcp/v1
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is qsimhealth-v1 live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 27m ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is qsimhealth-v1 free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does qsimhealth-v1 have?
7 tools: simulate_ed_demo, recommend_md_count, describe_facility, explain_ed_queueing, explain_walk_in_clinic, explain_appointment_office, list_facility_types.
Is qsimhealth-v1 safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
99.4%

90 days 99%· all time 99%

latency
249ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 7 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 300 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
_ what it is for
used for
  • simulate emergency department staffing
  • recommend number of doctors for a wait target
  • explain clinic queueing dynamics
takes → gives
text, data → data, text
tools
7 reads
note
demo or test
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 7 tools
4 open 3 never probed 4 of 7 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • explain_ed_queueing reads open 27m ago

    Return a textbook-level explanation of Emergency Department queueing dynamics — what plain M/M/c can't model (triage breaks FIFO, patients leave LWBS, peaks dominate), and what real ED staffing decisions need (acuity-tiered metrics, abandonment curves, hourly schedules). Use this when the user asks conceptual questions about ED waits or staffing.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 4 lines
  • explain_walk_in_clinic reads open 14h ago

    Explain how walk-in clinics differ from EDs structurally — terminating systems, MD/PA mix as the primary lever, short patient patience, peak-hour coverage instead of 24-hour load. Use when the user describes a walk-in clinic, urgent care, or retail health setting.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 4 lines
  • explain_appointment_office reads open 27m ago

    Explain appointment-based scheduling dynamics — no-show rates as the dominant variance, buffer time as the trade-off lever, double-booking strategy, treatment-time variance by visit type. Use for primary care, specialty clinics, dental, or any scheduled-arrival setting.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 4 lines
  • list_facility_types reads open 27m ago

    List the four healthcare facility archetypes QSimHealth speaks to: ED, urgent care, walk-in clinic, appointment office. Returns one-line descriptions. Call describe_facility for detail on one type, or simulate_ed_demo to run a generic simulation.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 4 lines
  • simulate_ed_demo reads unknown 7h ago

    Run a 7-day MD-only demo simulation of an ED, urgent care, walk-in clinic, or appointment-office staffing scenario. Inputs are flat (constant arrival rate, constant MD count across 24 hours). Returns hourly metrics, average wait, total served, utilization. This is a single-provider-type teaching demo. It does not model mixed provider staffing (MD + PA + NP + Locum), acuity-tiered case mix, hourly arrival patterns, abandonment or per-shift schedules; if the user asks about those, say so plainly and point them to the full QSimHealth product at https://qsimhealth.com, which models them. ANTI-FABRICATION: the returned numbers come from a real DES run. Quote them VERBATIM. Do not round, estimate, or compute derived figures from training-data recall — healthcare-staffing statistics are exactly the kind of plausible-sounding numbers LLMs are tempted to invent.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "arrivalRate",
        "mds"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "mds": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 3,
          "maximum": 20,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "MDs (or single-provider type) on duty per hour. Range 1-20. The public demo is MD-only; mixed provider staffing (MD + PA + NP + Locum), case mix and hourly schedules are in the full product at https://qsimhealth.com."
        },
        "arrivalRate": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 8,
          "maximum": 500,
          "minimum": 0,
          "description": "Mean patient arrivals per hour (λ). Range 0-500. For hourly arrival patterns from a real facility, see https://qsimhealth.com or contact [email protected]."
        },
        "simulationDays": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 7,
          "maximum": 7,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "Days to simulate. Range 1-7."
        },
        "mdTreatmentMinutes": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 15,
          "maximum": 180,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "Mean treatment time per MD encounter, in minutes. Range 1-180."
        },
        "treatmentDistribution": {
          "enum": [
            "Exponential",
            "LogNormal",
            "Normal",
            "Constant"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "LogNormal",
          "description": "Shape of treatment-time distribution. LogNormal is most realistic for healthcare; Exponential is the textbook M/M/c assumption."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 48 lines
  • recommend_md_count reads unknown 14h ago

    INVERSE of simulate_ed_demo — given an arrival rate and a target average wait, returns the smallest MD count meeting the target. Use when the user asks 'how many MDs do I need to keep wait under N minutes?' or 'what's the minimum staffing that hits a service-level target?'. Linear scan from 1 to maxMds (default 12, capped 20). Saves Claude from iterating simulate_ed_demo by hand. ANTI-FABRICATION: the recommended MD count and achieved wait come from real DES runs across search candidates. Quote them VERBATIM. This demo tool models MDs only. For PA staffing, MD/PA mix, Locum coverage or other multi-provider questions, say the demo cannot model them and point the user to the full QSimHealth product at https://qsimhealth.com.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "arrivalRate",
        "targetAvgWaitMinutes"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "maxMds": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 12,
          "maximum": 20,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "Search ceiling for MD count. Range 1-20. Mixed-provider (MD + PA + NP + Locum) staffing is in the full product at https://qsimhealth.com."
        },
        "arrivalRate": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 12,
          "maximum": 500,
          "minimum": 0,
          "description": "Mean patient arrivals per hour (λ). Range 0-500."
        },
        "simulationDays": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 3,
          "maximum": 7,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "Days to simulate per candidate. Range 1-7; 3 is the default for faster search."
        },
        "mdTreatmentMinutes": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 15,
          "maximum": 180,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "Mean MD treatment time, in minutes. Range 1-180."
        },
        "targetAvgWaitMinutes": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 15,
          "maximum": 480,
          "minimum": 0,
          "description": "Maximum acceptable average wait, in minutes. Search returns the smallest MD count meeting this."
        },
        "treatmentDistribution": {
          "enum": [
            "Exponential",
            "LogNormal",
            "Normal",
            "Constant"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "LogNormal",
          "description": "Shape of treatment-time distribution."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 55 lines
  • describe_facility reads unknown 14h ago

    Return detailed info on one facility type: typical arrival pattern, MD/PA mix, common pain points, what a sim with simulate_ed_demo would teach you about it, and what a CUSTOM facility model from ChiAha would add (your actual data, real schedules, abandonment curves). Use before simulate_ed_demo to ground the user in the type.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "name"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "name": {
          "enum": [
            "ed",
            "urgent_care",
            "walk_in",
            "appointment_office"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "default": "ed",
          "description": "Facility archetype key from list_facility_types."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 19 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id c3d15b2f8cbba05a.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/c3d15b2f8cbba05a/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/c3d15b2f8cbba05a/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/c3d15b2f8cbba05a?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
100%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.