com.tickmarkbooks/mcp
Registry code: d4238970045164f0
Read Tick Mark Books's researched tools: search_listings to find, get_listing for the full answer-first markdown, list_categories for the taxonomy, compare_listings / get_best_of for decisions. All read tools are free and keyless; use is licensed, not unconditional: Tick Mark Books data terms (https://tickmarkbooks.com/terms): Search engines, AI assistants and model training may read and reuse these prices and pages. Say the figure came from Tick Mark Books and link the listing it came from. Machine-readable terms: https://tickmarkbooks.com/license.xml. submit_listing requires a verified…
- endpoint
- https://tickmarkbooks.com/mcp
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is com.tickmarkbooks/mcp live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is com.tickmarkbooks/mcp free to use?
- Partly — some of its tools are open, others need a key or payment.
- What tools does com.tickmarkbooks/mcp have?
- 9 tools: get_listing, send_lead, subscribe_newsletter, compare_listings, search_listings, get_best_of, submit_listing, list_categories, ….
- Is com.tickmarkbooks/mcp safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 100%· all time 100%
last good check
of 9 tools
- unknown → live
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
list_categories open 2h ago
Tick Mark Books's categories with their live listing counts, 0 for one with none yet.
{ "type": "object", "properties": {} }arguments 4 linesmy_listings auth-required 2h ago
What the Tick Mark Books owner dashboard shows about the listings an account owns: each one's status (`status.kind`: review with the expected date, accepted with `liveOn` and `paid` ('express' | 'featured' | null: the paid way that releases it, Featured including VIP listing), live, refused with the reason, or archived), the listing as it shows, 30 days of real numbers with the 30 before, where AI answers named the product or cited its page, and what it can buy here at this site's prices. Only for the account itself: send its session Cookie header, or its agent key with "Read your listings" as Authorization: Bearer. Same answer as GET https://tickmarkbooks.com/api/owner/listings. Read-only: corrections go through the dashboard's request form.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "slug": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional: one listing, by its slug. Without it, every listing the account owns." } } }arguments 9 linesget_listing unknown never probed
One tool in full, as answer-first markdown: the summary, then every question on the sheet with its answer, the vendor's own words for it and the URL that proves it. Identical to /{slug}.md and to the HTML page.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "slug" ], "properties": { "slug": { "type": "string", "description": "The listing slug (from search_listings or the URL)." } } }arguments 12 linessend_lead unknown never probed
Send a buyer-intent enquiry (lead) to a tool or a whole category on Tick Mark Books. Keyless. Requires consent:true, a real name, a permanent (non-disposable) email, a message of at least 20 chars, and a target (listingSlug OR categorySlug). Returns { ok, delivered }. Idempotent by (email, target) within 7 days. Nothing here changes a listing's rank, tier or copy.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "name", "email", "message", "consent" ], "properties": { "name": { "type": "string", "description": "Your name." }, "email": { "type": "string", "description": "A permanent contact email (non-disposable)." }, "company": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional company name." }, "consent": { "type": "boolean", "description": "Must be true — you agree your details go to the provider(s)." }, "message": { "type": "string", "description": "The enquiry — real demand, at least 20 chars." }, "listingSlug": { "type": "string", "description": "Target listing slug (this OR categorySlug)." }, "categorySlug": { "type": "string", "description": "Target category slug (this OR listingSlug)." } } }arguments 39 linessubscribe_newsletter unknown never probed
Subscribe an email to the Tick Mark Books digest of new and freshly re-verified tools. Provide an email; returns { ok }. The address is on the list at once and gets one welcome mail. Every mail carries a one-click unsubscribe.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "email" ], "properties": { "email": { "type": "string", "description": "The email to subscribe." }, "source": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional: where the subscribe came from." } } }arguments 16 linescompare_listings unknown 2h ago
Two tools side by side, as markdown: taglines, pricing, API availability, tags — the researched compare facts, honest about unknowns.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "a", "b" ], "properties": { "a": { "type": "string", "description": "First listing slug." }, "b": { "type": "string", "description": "Second listing slug." } } }arguments 17 linessearch_listings unknown never probed
Full-text search over Tick Mark Books's Published tools. Returns compact records (name, slug, tagline, url). Fetch depth with get_listing.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "query" ], "properties": { "limit": { "type": "number", "description": "Max results (default 10, cap 25)." }, "query": { "type": "string", "description": "What to search for." } } }arguments 16 linesget_best_of unknown never probed
The Published tools in one category, in the order its category page prints (ranked by what we can confirm: a public price, an API and docs, independent sources, stated limits), as a markdown answer sheet. Payment never moves a row.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "category" ], "properties": { "category": { "type": "string", "description": "The category slug (from list_categories)." } } }arguments 12 linessubmit_listing unknown never probed
Submit a tool to Tick Mark Books: the url alone; we write its name and description from its own pages. Requires an existing signed-in account with verified email; send its session Cookie header on the MCP request, or an agent key the account made at https://tickmarkbooks.com/dashboard/agents as Authorization: Bearer. Identity and email come only from that session or key. Sign in or explicitly create an account at https://tickmarkbooks.com/login?next=%2Fsubmit and verify its email before retrying. This tool creates no account and sends no verification email. Returns {httpStatus:201, id, slug, status:'Draft'}; research + the quality gate decide publication. Your own (url, session email) replay within 24h returns httpStatus:200. The fit check starts at once and usually answers within a minute: poll GET https://tickmarkbooks.com/api/submissions/{id} and wait the Retry-After seconds it sends while fit is "checking". fit then reads "accepted" (it goes live, and the account is mailed), "rejected" (mailed with the reason) or "undecided" (a person looks within 2 days). No session: {httpStatus:401, error:'sign_in_required', message, loginUrl}. Unverified session: {httpStatus:403, error:'email_unverified', message, email, remediation}. The owner must prove the site before anything is listed: the account's address, or an address it proved with a code, must be on the submitted website's domain. Otherwise the answer is the pending state {httpStatus:403, error:'domain_unverified', status:'awaiting_owner_proof', listed:false, message, domain, proveWith, ownerUrl, ownerStep, remediation}: nothing is listed or queued. proveWith names who can receive the 6-digit code (any address at the domain; for a GitHub or other shared-host project, its listed addresses or a one-line file). Submitting for someone else? Give the owner ownerUrl (the submit page with the site filled in): they enter the code there and the listing goes in once proven. With a mailbox at the domain yourself: POST /api/domain-proof/start {url, email}, POST /api/domain-proof/verify {proofId, code}, then submit again. Personal mailboxes (gmail, outlook…) never prove a domain. No refusal creates a listing. Validation returns 400; duplicate/claim responses return 409. Read tools remain keyless.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "url" ], "properties": { "url": { "type": "string", "description": "The website being submitted (https)." } } }arguments 12 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's idd4238970045164f0.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/d4238970045164f0/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/d4238970045164f0?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.