threatist
Registry code: d9ef39435f429ca3
Threatist vulnerability records. Each record has a Threatist id TI-YYYY-NNNNN; CVE, GHSA and vendor ids are its aliases, and any of them finds the record. Priority is a score from 0 to 100 with a band (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW) and a confidence word. Every value names its source. Links are relative to https://threatist.io. When you use the data, credit "Data from Threatist" with a link (terms: https://threatist.io/terms).
- endpoint
- https://threatist.io/mcp
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is threatist live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 18h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is threatist free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does threatist have?
- 5 tools: get_vendor, get_advisory, get_vulnerability, search_vulnerabilities, list_exploited.
- Is threatist safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 100%· all time 100%
last good check
of 5 tools
- unknown → live
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
search_vulnerabilities open 18h ago
Records matching a text and filters, a page at a time. Pass next as cursor for the next page.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "q": { "type": "string", "description": "Words to look for in the title, description, products and ids" }, "cwe": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "CWE ids such as CWE-79, any of" }, "band": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "CRITICAL", "HIGH", "MEDIUM", "LOW" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Priority bands, any of" }, "sort": { "enum": [ "relevance", "newest", "priority", "cvss", "epss" ], "type": "string", "description": "Order of the results; relevance needs q" }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 1, "description": "Records per page, 1 to 100 (default 10)" }, "cursor": { "type": "string", "description": "The next value of the previous page" }, "signal": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "kev", "fix", "nofix", "cve" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Signals, all of: kev (in CISA KEV), fix (a fix is listed), nofix (no fix listed), cve (has a CVE id)" }, "vendor": { "type": "string", "description": "A vendor key such as microsoft or schneider-electric" }, "product": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Product names, any of" }, "component": { "type": "string", "description": "A component of the vendor, as on the vendor's page; needs vendor" }, "exploited": { "type": "boolean", "description": "Only records in CISA KEV" }, "fixStatus": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "fixed", "partial", "will_not_fix", "deferred", "no_fix_listed" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Fix states, any of" }, "published": { "enum": [ "7d", "30d", "12m" ], "type": "string", "description": "Published within the last 7 days, 30 days or 12 months" }, "impactType": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "code_execution", "privilege_escalation", "security_bypass", "information_disclosure", "tampering", "denial_of_service", "spoofing", "cross_site_scripting", "sql_injection" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Impact types, any of" }, "privileges": { "enum": [ "none" ], "type": "string", "description": "none: no privileges required" }, "attackVector": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "network", "adjacent", "local", "physical" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Attack vectors from the CVSS vector, any of" }, "userInteraction": { "enum": [ "none" ], "type": "string", "description": "none: no user interaction required" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 151 lineslist_exploited open 18h ago
Recent additions to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue. Newest first, each with its Threatist record.
{ "type": "object", "properties": { "limit": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 1, "description": "Entries per page, 1 to 100 (default 10)" }, "since": { "enum": [ "7d", "30d", "90d", "all" ], "type": "string", "description": "Added within the last 7, 30 or 90 days, or all (default 7d)" }, "cursor": { "type": "string", "description": "The next value of the previous page" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 26 linesget_vendor unknown 45h ago
A vendor's records, highest priority first. Takes the same filters as search_vulnerabilities.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "vendor" ], "properties": { "q": { "type": "string", "description": "Words to look for in the title, description, products and ids" }, "cwe": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "CWE ids such as CWE-79, any of" }, "band": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "CRITICAL", "HIGH", "MEDIUM", "LOW" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Priority bands, any of" }, "sort": { "enum": [ "relevance", "newest", "priority", "cvss", "epss" ], "type": "string", "description": "Order of the results; relevance needs q" }, "limit": { "type": "integer", "maximum": 100, "minimum": 1, "description": "Records per page, 1 to 100 (default 10)" }, "cursor": { "type": "string", "description": "The next value of the previous page" }, "signal": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "kev", "fix", "nofix", "cve" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Signals, all of: kev (in CISA KEV), fix (a fix is listed), nofix (no fix listed), cve (has a CVE id)" }, "vendor": { "type": "string", "description": "A vendor key such as microsoft, apache or schneider-electric (lowercase, spaces as hyphens)" }, "product": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" }, "description": "Product names, any of" }, "component": { "type": "string", "description": "A component of the vendor, as on the vendor's page; needs vendor" }, "exploited": { "type": "boolean", "description": "Only records in CISA KEV" }, "fixStatus": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "fixed", "partial", "will_not_fix", "deferred", "no_fix_listed" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Fix states, any of" }, "published": { "enum": [ "7d", "30d", "12m" ], "type": "string", "description": "Published within the last 7 days, 30 days or 12 months" }, "impactType": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "code_execution", "privilege_escalation", "security_bypass", "information_disclosure", "tampering", "denial_of_service", "spoofing", "cross_site_scripting", "sql_injection" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Impact types, any of" }, "privileges": { "enum": [ "none" ], "type": "string", "description": "none: no privileges required" }, "attackVector": { "type": "array", "items": { "enum": [ "network", "adjacent", "local", "physical" ], "type": "string" }, "description": "Attack vectors from the CVSS vector, any of" }, "userInteraction": { "enum": [ "none" ], "type": "string", "description": "none: no user interaction required" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 154 linesget_advisory unknown 3d ago
A Red Hat RHSA or Microsoft KB or ADV with its CVEs and records.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "id" ], "properties": { "id": { "type": "string", "description": "An advisory id such as RHSA-2024:0001, KB5034441 or ADV240001" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 13 linesget_vulnerability unknown 18h ago
A record for a TI id or an alias such as a CVE or GHSA id. Merged ids give the surviving record. By default the record is shortened: no CPE matches, at most 20 references (exploits and patches first) and the 10 newest advisories; trimmed says what was cut.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "id" ], "properties": { "id": { "type": "string", "description": "A Threatist id such as TI-2021-19919, or an alias such as CVE-2021-44228 or GHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q" }, "full": { "type": "boolean", "description": "true: the whole record, as the REST API gives it, with every CPE match, reference and advisory" } }, "additionalProperties": false }arguments 17 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's idd9ef39435f429ca3.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/d9ef39435f429ca3/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/d9ef39435f429ca3?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 0
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 0
- success rate
- —
- median latency
- —
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.