ai-compliance-monitor

endpoint

https://ai-compliance-monitor.sgdata.workers.dev/mcp

protocol

streamable-http ·2024-11-05

authentication

none observed

public key

none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it

karma

0 · newcomer

Is ai-compliance-monitor live?

Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 24m ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.

Is ai-compliance-monitor free to use?

Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.

What tools does ai-compliance-monitor have?

4 tools: get_regulation_articles, check_obligations, compare_jurisdictions, check_deadline.

Is ai-compliance-monitor safe to connect?

The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

• check_deadline reads open 5h ago

  Returns upcoming and recent compliance deadlines with enforcement dates, penalty information, and related obligations. Use this to understand time-sensitive compliance requirements.

  mcp-tool

  123456789101112131415161718

  {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [],
    "properties": {
      "months_ahead": {
        "type": "number",
        "description": "Number of months ahead to look for upcoming deadlines. Default: 12"
      },
      "include_passed": {
        "type": "boolean",
        "description": "Whether to include deadlines that have already passed. Default: false"
      },
      "jurisdiction_code": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Optional jurisdiction code to filter by. Examples: EU, SG, US-CO"
      }
    }
  }

  arguments 18 lines copy
• get_regulation_articles reads unknown 5h ago

  Returns structured, machine-readable regulation details including specific articles, obligation classifications, risk levels, and evidence requirements. Use this to understand the detailed requirements of a specific regulation.

  mcp-tool

  12345678910111213141516

  {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "regulation_id"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "category": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Optional filter by obligation category. Options: transparency, record_keeping, human_oversight, risk_assessment, incident_reporting, data_governance, monitoring, audit"
      },
      "regulation_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "The regulation identifier. Options: eu-ai-act, sg-imda-agentic, co-ai-act"
      }
    }
  }

  arguments 16 lines copy
• check_obligations reads unknown 5h ago

  Given an AI agent use case and optional jurisdiction, returns all applicable regulatory obligations with evidence requirements, enforcement dates, and penalty information. Use this to understand what compliance requirements apply to a specific type of AI agent.

  mcp-tool

  12345678910111213141516

  {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "use_case"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "use_case": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "The AI agent use case to check. Examples: hiring_screening, credit_scoring, customer_service, content_moderation, medical_triage, autonomous_coding, financial_trading"
      },
      "jurisdiction_code": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "Optional jurisdiction code to filter by. Examples: EU, SG, US-CO. Omit to get all jurisdictions."
      }
    }
  }

  arguments 16 lines copy
• compare_jurisdictions reads unknown never probed

  Side-by-side comparison of regulatory obligations across jurisdictions for a given compliance category. Shows equivalent, overlapping, stricter, and weaker mappings between regulations. Use this to understand how requirements differ across borders.

  mcp-tool

  12345678910111213141516171819

  {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "category"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "category": {
        "type": "string",
        "description": "The obligation category to compare. Options: transparency, record_keeping, human_oversight, risk_assessment, incident_reporting, data_governance, monitoring, audit"
      },
      "jurisdictions": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "description": "Optional list of jurisdiction codes to compare. Default: all available. Examples: [\"EU\", \"SG\", \"US-CO\"]"
      }
    }
  }

  arguments 19 lines copy

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.