eulaw-legal-research

endpoint

https://eulaw.ai/api/mcp

protocol

streamable-http ·2025-06-18

authentication

bearer

public key

none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it

karma

0 · newcomer

Is eulaw-legal-research live?

Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.

Is eulaw-legal-research free to use?

Not anonymously — it asks for a key or a login before it will serve. Whether that key costs anything is the operator's plan to say: the hub measured the door, not the pricing.

What tools does eulaw-legal-research have?

3 tools: list_jurisdictions, get_document, search_legal_sources.

Is eulaw-legal-research safe to connect?

The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

• list_jurisdictions auth-required 2h ago

  List the jurisdiction codes this server can search, with their names. Call it before the first search of a conversation, or whenever a question names a country whose coverage you have not confirmed, so the search is scoped to codes that exist rather than guessed ones. Coverage changes as jurisdictions are added, so treat the returned list as current and do not assume a code is covered because it was covered before.

  mcp-tool

  1234

  {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {}
  }

  arguments 4 lines copy
• get_document auth-required 2h ago

  Fetch the text of a single document from the eulaw.ai corpus by the document_id and jurisdiction that search_legal_sources returned for it. Use it when a passage from search is not enough to answer accurately - to read the provision around a quoted fragment, to check a definition, or to confirm wording before relying on it. Documents can be long, so it returns a slice: the response states the total length and whether more remains, and offset pages through the rest. It takes only identifiers this server issued; it cannot fetch a document from a URL or a citation.

  mcp-tool

  123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

  {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "document_id",
      "jurisdiction"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "offset": {
        "type": "integer",
        "minimum": 0,
        "description": "Character offset to start reading from (default 0). Use it to continue past a truncated slice."
      },
      "max_chars": {
        "type": "integer",
        "maximum": 50000,
        "minimum": 1,
        "description": "How many characters to return (default 20000, maximum 50000)."
      },
      "document_id": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 500,
        "description": "The document_id from a search_legal_sources result. Opaque - do not construct one."
      },
      "jurisdiction": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 10,
        "description": "The jurisdiction code the document was returned under."
      }
    }
  }

  arguments 30 lines copy
• search_legal_sources auth-required 2h ago

  Semantic search over eulaw.ai's corpus of European legislation and case law. Use it whenever a question turns on what a European or national European law actually says, or on how a court has applied it, and you need the authoritative text rather than recollection. Returns one entry per matching document: title, jurisdiction, document type, publication date, the identifiers that document carries (CELEX, ELI, ECLI where they apply), a source URL, an opaque document_id, and a passage from the document. It returns passages, not whole documents - call get_document with the document_id when the surrounding text matters. It cannot answer about jurisdictions outside the covered set: call list_jurisdictions first if you do not already know which codes are covered. It is not a general web search and holds no material outside the legal corpus.

  mcp-tool

  12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334

  {
    "type": "object",
    "required": [
      "query",
      "jurisdictions"
    ],
    "properties": {
      "limit": {
        "type": "integer",
        "maximum": 50,
        "minimum": 1,
        "description": "How many documents to return (default 8)."
      },
      "query": {
        "type": "string",
        "maxLength": 2000,
        "minLength": 2,
        "description": "What to search for, as a natural-language description of the legal question or subject matter. Matching is semantic, so a full question works better than isolated keywords. Query in the language of the jurisdiction being searched where possible: the corpus is stored in each source's own language, and a query in another language matches it only through translation."
      },
      "jurisdictions": {
        "type": "array",
        "items": {
          "type": "string"
        },
        "maxItems": 15,
        "minItems": 1,
        "description": "Which jurisdictions to search, as the codes returned by list_jurisdictions. Required - there is no all-jurisdictions search. At most 15 per call."
      },
      "only_in_force": {
        "type": "boolean",
        "description": "When true, drop documents whose expiry date has passed, so only currently applicable law is returned. Leave false (the default) when legislative history, superseded versions or the state of the law at some earlier time is part of the question. Setting it costs additional lookup time."
      }
    }
  }

  arguments 34 lines copy

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.