_ registry / mcp streamable-http · checked 42m ago

xither

https://www.xither.com

Registry code: f055b63f030703e6

api record

Xither keeps dated, hashed copies of the pages AI and SaaS vendors publish: sub-processor lists, data processing agreements, trust pages and deprecation schedules. Every fact these tools return is a stored reading with its source URL and the date Xither read it; cite both when you repeat it. Xither reports what a page says, not what it means. Use search_vendors when unsure of a vendor's slug, then lookup_vendor for one vendor.

endpoint
https://www.xither.com/mcp
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is xither live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 42m ago). It answered 99% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is xither free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does xither have?
4 tools: search_vendors, lookup_vendor, notice_windows, upcoming_model_retirements.
Is xither safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
98.8%

90 days 99.1%· all time 99.1%

latency
328ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 4 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 350 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • down → live
_ what it is for
used for
  • look up a vendor sub-processor list
  • get sub-processor notice windows
  • list upcoming ai model retirements
takes → gives
text → data
tools
4 reads
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 4 tools
2 open 2 never probed 2 of 4 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • notice_windows reads open 23h ago

    Every sub-processor notice window Xither can quote: the number of days (business days where the clause says so) each vendor's own terms state for a new sub-processor, and what that number counts (basis: 'objection' = time to object once told, 'notice' = notice before the change, 'unstated' = the clause does not settle it), with the verbatim clause, its source URL and the date Xither read it. The same table as www.xither.com/notice-windows. A vendor not listed has no window Xither could quote.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {},
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 5 lines
  • upcoming_model_retirements reads open 23h ago

    Model and API retirement dates from the retirement tables vendors publish, as Xither last read them, soonest first: model, date, the replacement the vendor names, the verbatim table row, source URL and read date. Optional vendor filter; within_days defaults to 90, maximum 365; at most 50 rows. Covers only vendors whose retirement tables Xither reads.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "vendor": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 200,
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "Optional vendor name, slug or domain."
        },
        "within_days": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 90,
          "maximum": 365,
          "minimum": 1,
          "description": "How many days ahead to look, from today."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 19 lines
  • search_vendors reads unknown 6h ago

    Find vendors in the Xither record by name, slug or domain. Returns up to 10 matches, each with its name, slug and record URL, and no record data. Pass a slug to lookup_vendor for the record.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "query"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "query": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 100,
          "minLength": 2,
          "description": "Part of a vendor name, a slug or a domain."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 15 lines
  • lookup_vendor reads unknown 23h ago

    The Xither record for one vendor. Use it when the user names a specific vendor and asks where it publishes its sub-processor list or DPA, how long its terms give to object to a new sub-processor, what it has changed, or when its models retire. Returns: where it publishes its sub-processor list and data processing agreement and when Xither last read each page (or why a page cannot be read); the notice window its agreement states for new sub-processors (quoted, with source URL and read date); its public changes to either document with permalinks; and model retirement dates it publishes for the next 365 days. One vendor per call; accepts a name, slug or domain. If the name matches several vendors it returns their slugs to call again with; if it matches none, the vendor is not in the record, which says nothing about what the vendor publishes. Use search_vendors instead when you only have part of a name, notice_windows to compare windows across vendors, and upcoming_model_retirements for retirements across vendors. Changes appear 30 days after Xither records them; subscribers get them the same morning at www.xither.com/pricing.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "vendor"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "vendor": {
          "type": "string",
          "maxLength": 200,
          "minLength": 1,
          "description": "A vendor name, slug or domain, for example \"HubSpot\", \"hubspot\" or \"hubspot.com\"."
        }
      },
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
    arguments 15 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id f055b63f030703e6.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/f055b63f030703e6/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/f055b63f030703e6/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/f055b63f030703e6?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
80%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.