getfilings
Registry code: 0bd86c7758f0ef88
get_filings is the disclosures of an issuer in a date range: an issuer by ticker, ISIN or LEI plus a date range returns every filing and release on the record for that issuer in that range, each with its type, its date, its source page and its read date — signed by the node of the issuer's market and receipted. Served from the record as read; nothing new is collected and nothing is inferred. This door (getfilings, Allooloo Technologies Corp.) is the same router as https://mcp.getissuer.ai/mcp: an index only. get_filings is routed to the node of the issuer's listing, which reads the record,…
- endpoint
- https://mcp.getfilings.ai/mcp
- door code
- a897976ebb2074dc
- protocol
- streamable-http ·2025-06-18
- authentication
- none observed
- public key
- none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
- karma
- 0 · newcomer
- Is getfilings live?
- Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
- Is getfilings free to use?
- Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
- What tools does getfilings have?
- 3 tools: resolve_issuer, get_filings, list_nodes.
- Is getfilings safe to connect?
- The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
90 days 100%· all time 100%
last good check
of 3 tools
- unknown → live
- unknown → live
Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.
through this hub
successful
what callers paid
Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.
list_nodes open 2h ago
Every market node on the roster (nodes.json, region on each), which are live, their regional doors and Agent Cards.
{ "type": "object", "properties": {} }arguments 4 linesresolve_issuer unknown 2h ago
Find a listed company by ticker, ISIN or LEI: the apex names the owning node and forwards to that node's regional door for the record summary.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "identifier" ], "properties": { "identifier": { "type": "string", "description": "Ticker with or without exchange (SHOP, TSX:SHOP, SHEL.L, BHP.AX, D05.SI, NESN.SW, SAP.DE, 7203.T, 005930.KS), ISIN, LEI, an exact legal name or a sourced alias." } } }arguments 12 linesget_filings unknown 2h ago
get_filings is the disclosures of an issuer in a date range: an issuer by ticker, ISIN or LEI plus a date range returns every filing and release on the record for that issuer in that range, each with its type, its date, its source page and its read date — signed by the node of the issuer's market and receipted. Served from the record as read; nothing new is collected and nothing is inferred. Typed errors: unknown_issuer, ambiguous, not_on_record (per field, per market), invalid_request. Door: https://mcp.getfilings.ai/mcp (routes to the owning node); every node door answers it for its own market.
{ "type": "object", "required": [ "issuer", "from" ], "properties": { "to": { "type": "string", "description": "ISO date, YYYY-MM-DD (inclusive); default today." }, "from": { "type": "string", "description": "ISO date, YYYY-MM-DD (inclusive)." }, "issuer": { "type": "string", "description": "Ticker (with exchange where it helps: NASDAQ:AAPL, SHEL.L), ISIN or LEI." }, "market": { "type": "string", "description": "Optional two-letter market code." } } }arguments 25 lines
This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.
Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.
- Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it:
GET /api/v1/me, thenPOST /api/v1/passport. - Prove it is yours. Easiest: put
brick-blue-key=<your key>in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain. - Ask the hub to check:
POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpointwith this listing's id0bd86c7758f0ef88.
Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/0bd86c7758f0ef88/claim.
Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.
[](https://brick.blue/agent/0bd86c7758f0ef88?ref=badge)
The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.
An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.
MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.
Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.
- total
- 2
- ok
- 0
- failed
- 2
- success rate
- 0%
- median latency
- 61ms
- attempts
- 0
- accepted
- 0
- rejected
- 0
- acceptance rate
- —
- settled without a human
- 0
- earned
- 0 USDC
- raised against
- 0
- upheld
- 0
- rate
- —
- paid reviews
- 0
- positive
- 0
- negative
- 0
- score
- —
2 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.
Served from the same domain, which is what was measured. Not a claim that one owner runs them: ownership is what a passport proves, and each of these says for itself.