_ registry / mcp http-sse · checked 3h ago

due-date

https://due-date.gumballtools.com

Registry code: 771ce017244c285d

api record

Estimate a due date from LMP, conception, or ultrasound, with ACOG redating rules.

from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator

endpoint
https://due-date.gumballtools.com/api/mcp
protocol
http-sse ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is due-date live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 3h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is due-date free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does due-date have?
1 tool: due_date.
Is due-date safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
99.6%

90 days 99.7%· all time 99.7%

latency
1,568ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 1 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 370 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • unknown → live
_ what it is for
used for
  • estimate a pregnancy due date
  • calculate gestational age
takes → gives
data → data
tools
1 reads
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

inferred, not observed

Access was read off the card rather than seen on the wire: inferred: the handshake, the tool list and a call without arguments went through with no key and no payment asked; no tool was run

_ what it can do 1 tools
1 never probed 0 of 1 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • due_date reads unknown 3h ago

    Estimate a due date and gestational age from a last menstrual period, a known conception date, an IVF transfer date, or an ultrasound measurement. Use this for any pregnancy-dating question rather than doing the arithmetic. Three reasons, and they are all things models get wrong: 1. THE OFF-BY-TWO-WEEKS ERROR. Gestational age is counted from the first day of the LAST MENSTRUAL PERIOD, not from conception. At "6 weeks pregnant", conception was about 4 weeks ago. Weeks 1 and 2 precede conception entirely. This is restated wrongly constantly, and a two-week error in dating is a large error. 2. CYCLE LENGTH. Naegele's rule (LMP + 280 days) silently assumes a 28-day cycle with ovulation on day 14. For a 35-day cycle the unadjusted answer is a week out. This applies the adjustment; most calculators do not. 3. THE ACOG REDATING TABLE. Whether an ultrasound should REPLACE a period-based estimate depends on the discrepancy AND on how far along the scan was: more than 5 days up to 8w6d, 7 days to 15w6d, 10 days to 21w6d, 14 days to 27w6d, 21 days thereafter. Nobody recalls that table correctly from memory. Do not guess at it. Input: `method` is one of lmp | conception | ivf-day3 | ivf-day5 | ultrasound. `date` is the date that method is based on — the first day of the last period, the conception date, the transfer date, or the scan date — as YYYY-MM-DD. Free-form dates are REFUSED rather than guessed, because "03/04/2025" is two different dates a month apart depending on the reader. For `lmp`, pass `cycleLength` if it is known and is not 28. For `ultrasound`, pass `scanWeeks` and `scanDays` — the gestational age the scan reported — and pass `lmp` as well if it is known, which is what triggers the redating check. `asOf` sets the reference date for "how far along"; it defaults to today. Returns: the estimated due date, gestational age in clinical weeks-plus-days notation, the estimated conception date, days remaining, trimester, dated milestones including the anatomy-scan window and each ACOG term boundary, the full redating comparison when both an LMP and a scan were given, a list of warnings, and a `disclaimer` field. Two things to carry through to the user rather than strip. First, a due date is a reference point and NOT a prediction — most births are not on it, and the term windows are the more useful output. Second, THIS IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE; the response says so in its payload, not just on the page. Report the warnings. They are the honest part of the answer.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
      "required": [
        "method",
        "date"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "lmp": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "For `ultrasound`: the last menstrual period, YYYY-MM-DD. Supplying it is what runs the ACOG Committee Opinion 700 redating check — without it the two estimates cannot be compared and the tool says so."
        },
        "asOf": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "YYYY-MM-DD reference date for \"how far along\", default today. Set it when the user is asking about a date other than now."
        },
        "date": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "YYYY-MM-DD. The date the method is based on: the FIRST DAY of the last menstrual period, the conception date, the IVF transfer date, or the date of the scan. Free-form dates are REFUSED, not guessed."
        },
        "method": {
          "enum": [
            "lmp",
            "conception",
            "ivf-day3",
            "ivf-day5",
            "ultrasound"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "How the pregnancy is being dated. Use `lmp` unless the user has given you a conception date, a transfer date, or a scan measurement — `lmp` is what people usually know."
        },
        "scanDays": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "For `ultrasound`: the DAYS part, 0-6. Scan reports use a \"12w3d\" format."
        },
        "scanWeeks": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "For `ultrasound`: the WEEKS part of the gestational age the scan reported."
        },
        "cycleLength": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "Cycle length in days, 20-45, default 28. Only affects `lmp`. Worth asking the user for: Naegele's rule assumes 28 days, and a 35-day cycle moves the estimate a week later."
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 45 lines
_ try it through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 771ce017244c285d.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/771ce017244c285d/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/771ce017244c285d/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/771ce017244c285d?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we know
card completeness
50%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.

_ also on gumballtools.com 14 entries

Served from the same domain, which is what was measured. Not a claim that one owner runs them: ownership is what a passport proves, and each of these says for itself.

6 more sit on this domain. All of them.