_ registry / mcp + a2a HTTP+JSON · checked 54m ago

locus-mcp

https://api.locus.report

Registry code: b0831aa9e1a3db5f

api record

Locus returns cited US public records and bounded local context — awareness, never a safe/unsafe label, score, ranking, appraisal, or buy/pass verdict. Workflow: (1) Call locus_search_tools to find matching free or paid tools and read their inputSchema, coverage, and price. (2) For multi-step diligence or unfamiliar intents, run free locus_suggest_workflow, locus_recipes, or locus_lane_availability via locus_execute first so you only query covered lanes. (3) Call locus_execute with { name, arguments }. Skills & events: Read skill://locus/choosing-a-locus-tool,…

endpoint
https://api.locus.report/a2a/v1
door code
bba13ee802955f81
protocol
HTTP+JSON ·1.0
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is locus-mcp live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 54m ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is locus-mcp free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does locus-mcp have?
5 tools: Environmental and infrastructure evidence, Site feasibility preflight, Property context, Compare and monitor places, Policy and development watch.
Is locus-mcp safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
99.9%

90 days 99.6%· all time 99.8%

latency
2,003ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 5 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 1702 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
  • degraded → live
  • degraded → live
  • live → degraded· timeout after 20000ms
_ what it is for
used for
  • look up zoning and parcel records for a us address
  • check flood zone for an address
  • find building permits and property taxes
takes → gives
text → data
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts, and USDC settlements on base into the address this listing's priced doors name, read off the chain. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers. The address also stands behind 2 other origins: the chain figures are the gateway's, not this listing's alone. How it is counted.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

payers on base
26

distinct

settlements
545

last 2026-11-10

received on chain
18.67 USDC

shared-payto

_ what it can do 5 tools
5 never probed 0 of 5 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • environment-infrastructure unknown never probed

    Find the appropriate environmental, terrain, water, power, and broadband evidence for a site. The paid power/water pack is evidence only: never capacity, interconnection, service-availability, or substation-location claims.

    workflowwetlandsterrainpowerwaterinfrastructure

  • site-feasibility unknown never probed

    Start a property or land pre-development screen: coverage, parcel/zoning/flood/soil, mapped wetlands, terrain, and official sources to verify. Search leaves first, then execute only the relevant cited primitives.

    workflowsite-feasibilitypre-developmentfree-first

  • property-context unknown never probed

    Build a bounded, cited property-context pass around parcel, flood, zoning, taxes, records, and what to verify next. Never use Locus for screening, valuation, or safe/unsafe verdicts.

    workflowpropertydue-diligencefree-first

  • compare-and-monitor unknown never probed

    Create a side-by-side property difference plan, then save/follow a place and inspect cited changes over time. Preserve source gaps rather than treating missing records as a negative finding.

    workflowcomparisonmonitoringproperty

  • policy-and-development unknown never probed

    Route a place to official legislation, development, permits, capital-project, and local-change evidence before paying for a cited synthesis where supported.

    workflowpolicydevelopmentpermitsofficial-records

_ try it over a2a through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id b0831aa9e1a3db5f.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/b0831aa9e1a3db5f/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/b0831aa9e1a3db5f/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/b0831aa9e1a3db5f?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we knowoff the mcp door
card completeness
60%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
0
ok
0
failed
0
success rate
—
median latency
—
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

0 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.

_ also on locus.report 1 entry

Served from the same domain, which is what was measured. Not a claim that one owner runs them: ownership is what a passport proves, and each of these says for itself.