_ registry / mcp + a2a streamable-http · checked 2h ago

building-compliance-agency-mcp

https://buildingcompliance.co.za

Registry code: b1ba8f22a3fdefc8

api record

Building plan approvals, occupancy certificates, and municipal compliance readiness tools.

from a public catalogue that lists it, not from the operator

endpoint
https://buildingcompliance.co.za/mcp
door code
c333a8c8daab7dbc
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-03-26
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is building-compliance-agency-mcp live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 2h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is building-compliance-agency-mcp free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does building-compliance-agency-mcp have?
3 tools: estimate_scrutiny_fee, submit_compliance_inquiry, check_zoning_requirements.
Is building-compliance-agency-mcp safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
100%

90 days 100%· all time 100%

latency
280ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 3 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 2 checks · signed record
  • unknown → live
  • unknown → live
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 3 tools
1 open 2 never probed 1 of 3 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • check_zoning_requirements open 2h ago

    Retrieves typical municipal coverage, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), height, and parking requirements for a given Gauteng municipality and zoning category.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "municipality",
        "zoning_category"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "municipality": {
          "enum": [
            "Johannesburg",
            "Tshwane",
            "Ekurhuleni"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Target metropolitan municipality"
        },
        "zoning_category": {
          "enum": [
            "Residential 1",
            "Residential 2",
            "Residential 3",
            "Residential 4",
            "Business 1",
            "Business 4",
            "Industrial 1",
            "Commercial"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Town planning zoning category"
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 32 lines
  • estimate_scrutiny_fee unknown never probed

    Estimates municipal building plan scrutiny fees (ZAR) in Gauteng based on total floor area (sqm), municipality, and SANS 10400 occupancy classification.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "floor_area_sqm",
        "municipality",
        "building_classification"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "municipality": {
          "enum": [
            "Johannesburg",
            "Tshwane",
            "Ekurhuleni"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Gauteng metropolitan municipality"
        },
        "floor_area_sqm": {
          "type": "number",
          "description": "Total floor area in square meters (sqm)"
        },
        "building_classification": {
          "enum": [
            "A1",
            "B1",
            "E1",
            "F1",
            "G1",
            "H1",
            "H3",
            "H4"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "SANS 10400 occupancy classification (e.g., H4 for dwelling house, G1 for offices)"
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 37 lines
  • submit_compliance_inquiry unknown never probed

    Submits a compliance consultation or quote request for council building plan approval, archive plan retrieval, occupancy certificates, fire clearance, SDP, or rezoning.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "required": [
        "client_name",
        "email",
        "phone",
        "service_required"
      ],
      "properties": {
        "email": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Contact email address"
        },
        "phone": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Contact phone number (South African format)"
        },
        "client_name": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Full name of the property owner, architect, or developer"
        },
        "property_details": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Erf number, suburb, municipality (Johannesburg, Tshwane, Ekurhuleni), and project summary"
        },
        "service_required": {
          "enum": [
            "Building Plan Submission",
            "Obtain Approved Plans",
            "Occupancy Certificates",
            "Fire Clearance Certificates",
            "Site Development Plans",
            "Council Drawings",
            "Rezoning Applications",
            "Consent Use Applications",
            "Township Establishment"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Primary compliance or town planning service requested"
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 42 lines
_ try it over mcp through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id b1ba8f22a3fdefc8.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/b1ba8f22a3fdefc8/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/b1ba8f22a3fdefc8/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/b1ba8f22a3fdefc8?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we knowoff the mcp door
card completeness
70%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
2
ok
0
failed
2
success rate
0%
median latency
127ms
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

2 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.