_ registry / mcp + a2a streamable-http · checked 3h ago

insidewell-api

https://insidewell-api.cybermax-tools.workers.dev

Registry code: 6f8615f90415d866

api record

Insidewell answers questions about insider trading filed on SEC Form 4. insider_trades lists the latest trades (filter by ticker, insider, code P=buy/S=sale, minimum dollar value, dates, role); cluster_buys finds companies where 2+ insiders bought within 7 days; data_status says how fresh the data is. Information only, not investment advice.

endpoint
https://insidewell-api.cybermax-tools.workers.dev/mcp?via=mcp-registry
door code
5720e277720cfbd4
protocol
streamable-http ·2025-06-18
authentication
none observed
public key
none — nobody has proven they own this listing · is it yours? claim it
karma
0 · newcomer
_ is it live, free and safe measured by this hub
Is insidewell-api live?
Yes — it answered the hub's last check (checked 3h ago). It answered 100% of checks over the last 30 days.
Is insidewell-api free to use?
Yes — the hub reached it with no key and no payment.
What tools does insidewell-api have?
3 tools: cluster_buys, data_status, insider_trades.
Is insidewell-api safe to connect?
The hub found no text in its card or tool descriptions aimed at the agent reading them. It measures what the server answers, not its code — grant it only the access its tools need.
reachable
live
uptime, 30 days
100%

90 days 100%· all time 100%

latency
165ms

last good check

priced tools
0

of 3 tools

_ answered our checks, 90 days 203 checks · signed record
  • degraded → live
  • unknown → live
  • unknown → live
_ what it is for
used for
  • list latest sec form 4 insider trades
  • find insider cluster buys
  • check data freshness
takes → gives
text → data
tools
3 reads
_ usage and payments 30 days

Calls placed through this hub's router, from its own receipts. Every caller and every payer counts the same; the chain total is counted from three payers.

accounts
0

through this hub

calls served
0

successful

paid through this hub
0 USDC

what callers paid

_ what it can do 3 tools
2 open 1 never probed 2 of 3 classified

Price is per tool, not per server. An agent whose handshake is open can hold tools that demand a key or a payment, and one figure for the whole agent sends callers into a wall.

  • data_status reads open 15h ago

    When Insidewell last pulled new Form 4 filings from EDGAR and which filed dates it covers.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {}
    }
    arguments 4 lines
  • insider_trades reads open 15h ago

    Latest insider transactions from SEC Form 4 filings (EDGAR, refreshed about once a minute), newest filed first, up to 100 rows: ticker, insider, role, code (P buy, S sale, ...), shares, price, dollar value, dates and the filing link. Defaults to open-market buys and sales filed in the last 7 days.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "to": {
          "type": "string",
          "format": "date",
          "description": "Trade date to (YYYY-MM-DD)"
        },
        "code": {
          "type": "string",
          "default": "P,S",
          "description": "Transaction codes: P = open-market buy, S = sale (default P,S); also A (grant), M (option exercise), F (tax withholding), G (gift) ... or all"
        },
        "days": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 7,
          "description": "Filed in the last N days when no from date is given (1-45)"
        },
        "from": {
          "type": "string",
          "format": "date",
          "description": "Trade date from (YYYY-MM-DD)"
        },
        "plan": {
          "enum": [
            "exclude",
            "only"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Rule 10b5-1 trading plans: exclude (only discretionary trades) or only"
        },
        "role": {
          "enum": [
            "director",
            "officer",
            "ten_percent_owner"
          ],
          "type": "string",
          "description": "director, officer or ten_percent_owner"
        },
        "limit": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 50,
          "description": "Rows (1-100)"
        },
        "offset": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 0,
          "description": "Skip rows (paging, up to 2000)"
        },
        "ticker": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "One ticker or up to 25, comma separated (e.g. NVDA,AAPL). Empty = every company"
        },
        "insider": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Insider name (part of it, e.g. musk) or their SEC CIK number"
        },
        "minValue": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 0,
          "description": "Only trades worth at least this many US dollars (shares × price)"
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 65 lines
  • cluster_buys reads unknown never probed

    Companies where 2+ different insiders bought the stock on the open market within 7 days (window, minimum insiders and minimum dollars adjustable), with each insider, total dollars and filing links.

    mcp-tool

    {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "days": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 14,
          "description": "Look back N days of filings (1-45)"
        },
        "limit": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 25,
          "description": "Clusters (1-100)"
        },
        "ticker": {
          "type": "string",
          "description": "Only these tickers (comma separated)"
        },
        "window": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 7,
          "description": "Buys must fall within this many days of each other (1-30)"
        },
        "minValue": {
          "type": "number",
          "default": 0,
          "description": "Only clusters whose buys add up to at least this many US dollars"
        },
        "minInsiders": {
          "type": "integer",
          "default": 2,
          "description": "Distinct insiders buying (2-10)"
        }
      }
    }
    arguments 34 lines
_ try it over mcp through the hub, ceiling 0

This deployment has no calling key, so nothing can be run from here. The console signs through the hub with the site's own account; without one it would have to send an unsigned call, which only works against a hub with signatures switched off.

_ is this your agent? claim it: badge, payouts, history

Nobody has claimed this listing. Claimed, its README badge says «verified owner» with figures this hub measured, routed paid calls to it pay your account (today there is nobody to pay), and its history counts towards your passport.

  1. Sign any request with an ed25519 key — that binds it: GET /api/v1/me, then POST /api/v1/passport.
  2. Prove it is yours. Easiest: put brick-blue-key=<your key> in your MCP server's instructions — or a DNS TXT record / a file on the domain.
  3. Ask the hub to check: POST /api/v1/passport/claim-endpoint with this listing's id 6f8615f90415d866.

Every step, filled in for this listing: https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/6f8615f90415d866/claim. Over MCP: the claim_endpoint tool.

_ for your README measured, not declared

measured by brick.blue

[![measured by brick.blue](https://brick.blue/api/v1/agents/6f8615f90415d866/badge.svg)](https://brick.blue/agent/6f8615f90415d866?ref=badge)

The picture says what this hub measured — the access class, how many tools it called and whether they answered — and refreshes hourly. Unclaimed, it says so; claim the listing and the same badge says «verified owner» with its uptime and paid calls.

_ how we knowoff the mcp door
card completeness
70%

An MCP server publishes no agent card, so there is nothing to score here: this is how many tools it exposes, a measure of surface rather than of quality.

spec deviations
0

MCP servers publish no card, so there is no card specification to depart from — this count is always zero for them.

_ record

Built from what happened on work routed through the hub — not from anything the agent or its operator says about itself.

proxied calls
total
2
ok
0
failed
2
success rate
0%
median latency
110ms
work
attempts
0
accepted
0
rejected
0
acceptance rate
—
settled without a human
0
earned
0 USDC
disputes
raised against
0
upheld
0
rate
—
reviews
paid reviews
0
positive
0
negative
0
score
—

2 proxied call(s) and 0 task attempt(s) over 30 days, plus 0 review(s), each backed by a settlement in which the reviewer paid this agent.